WeVote

Bill

Bill

A 6388

Relates to the establishment of local comprehensive emergency management plans

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Alicia Hyndman

Establishes a framework for local comprehensive emergency management plans, requiring municipalities to develop and align risk, response, and continuity plans to boost readiness.

SUBSTITUTED BY S896A
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 6388

A 6388 — Summary

At a glance

  • Bill number: A 6388
  • Title: Relates to the establishment of local comprehensive emergency management plans
  • Status: Referred to Governmental Operations
  • Introduced: March 4, 2025
  • Classification: bill
  • Related bills: A 9884 (prior-session); S 896 (companion)

Purpose and intent

Based on the bill’s title, A 6388 is intended to establish or set the framework for local comprehensive emergency management plans. The specific aims, requirements, and enforcement mechanisms are not provided in the information available here. The bill’s placement in the Governmental Operations committee suggests a focus on how local emergency management planning is organized, coordinated, and overseen across municipalities.

What is known (status and context)

  • The bill was introduced on March 4, 2025 and immediately referred to the Committee on Governmental Operations.
  • A companion bill exists in the Senate (S 896), indicating cross-chamber efforts to address local emergency management planning.
  • A 9884 is noted as a prior-session related bill, suggesting that the concept has been considered previously and may be reintroduced or amended in this session.

Notable provisions (text not provided)

The full text with precise provisions is not included here. When available, expected elements to review would include:
- Scope: which local governments are covered (cities, towns, villages, counties) and whether the plans apply statewide.
- Plan requirements: required components (risk assessment, hazard mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery, continuity of operations, resource management, communication strategies).
- Development and adoption: timelines for plan development, approval processes, official adoption, and periodic reviews or updates.
- Coordination: integration with state emergency management agencies, mutual aid agreements, and interoperability standards.
- Public transparency: requirements for public access to the plans and public comment opportunities.
- Funding and assistance: any state support, grants, or technical assistance to localities for plan development and maintenance.
- Compliance and enforcement: monitoring, reporting, and potential penalties or consequences for noncompliance.
- Timeline: effective date and any staged implementation.

Potential impact

  • Local governments: municipalities may need to develop, update, or align their emergency management plans to meet new standards; could involve planning departments, public safety officials, and elected leaders.
  • Emergency management agencies: heightened coordination with state authorities and mandatory training, exercises, and plan updates.
  • Residents and business communities: potentially improved preparedness, hazard mitigation, and faster, more coordinated responses during emergencies.
  • Financial: possible costs for plan development, training, exercises, and compliance; potential availability of state grants or technical assistance if provided in the bill text.

Procedural and timeline considerations

  • As a newly introduced bill, A 6388 will move through the standard legislative process: committee review (Governmental Operations), potential amendments, floor votes in the Assembly, and eventual consideration by the Senate (via its companion S 896) if advanced.
  • Updates and the release of the full bill text will be important to assess exact requirements, deadlines, and funding provisions.

How to follow up

  • Monitor the Assembly and Senate bill texts for A 6388 and S 896 to review the complete provisions.
  • Check for committee hearings or fiscal notes from the Governmental Operations committee.
  • Compare with A 9884 (prior-session) to understand historical intent or proposed changes.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.