WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 550

Relates to the administration of the statewide central register of child abuse and maltreatment

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Jabari Brisport and 18 co-sponsors

The bill gives the U.S. Court of Federal Claims authority to hear and resolve a one-time, treaty-based land claim by the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma, with a one-year filing window and

RETURNED TO SENATE
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 550

Summary — S. 550 (119th Congress) — Settlement of Miami Tribe land claims (S. Rept. 119‑76)

Note: The materials provided include multiple distinct items numbered “S.550” (including a Massachusetts state bill on solar/battery decommissioning and various state legislative actions). The primary federal document in the packet is Senate Report 119‑76 accompanying S. 550 (119th Congress). This summary focuses on that federal bill; brief notes on the other materials follow.

Purpose

S. 550 authorizes the United States Court of Federal Claims to hear and resolve a treaty‑based land takings claim by the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma arising from the Treaty of Grouseland (August 21, 1805). The bill creates a limited window for the Tribe to file that claim and extinguishes any other present or future Tribe claims to lands in Illinois.

Key provisions

  • Grants jurisdiction to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to “hear, determine, and render judgment” on a land claim by the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma under the 1805 Treaty of Grouseland, notwithstanding any other law.
  • Requires the Court to consider the claim “without regard to the statute of limitations,” explicitly including 28 U.S.C. §2501 and any delay‑based defenses.
  • Establishes a one‑year filing window: the Tribe must file any such claim within one year after the Act’s enactment; the jurisdiction conferred expires if no claim is filed within that period.
  • Permanently extinguishes all other claims by the Miami Tribe, its members, descendants, or predecessors in interest to lands located in the State of Illinois, except for any claim timely filed under the new jurisdictional authorization.

Background / rationale

  • The Miami Tribe alleges that, beginning in the 19th century, the United States sold parcels of lands reserved by the Tribe under the 1805 Treaty without tribal consent or compensation, producing clouded title for current landowners. The Tribe filed litigation in 2000 alleging treaty‑based takings; litigation remained unresolved at the time of the report.
  • The bill is intended to provide a single forum to resolve treaty claims and to extinguish remaining or future land claims, thereby settling title issues.

Who is affected

  • Miami Tribe of Oklahoma (and its members/descendants): may pursue one limited court action but will forfeit other and future claims to Illinois lands.
  • Current Illinois landowners whose property could be subject to historic title disputes (potential benefit of extinguishment).
  • U.S. government and the Court of Federal Claims (jurisdictional and adjudicative responsibilities).

Budgetary/other effects

  • Congressional Budget Office: enactment would increase both revenues (filing fees) and direct spending by an insignificant amount over 2025–2035.
  • The bill contains an intergovernmental mandate (extinguishing a legal right of action); CBO estimates the cost of that mandate would not exceed UMRA thresholds.

Legislative status & history (highlights)

  • Introduced in Senate: February 12, 2025 (Sponsors: Senators Mullin and Durbin).
  • Committee on Indian Affairs ordered reported favorably (Mar 5, 2025); reported with written report S. Rept. 119‑76 (Oct 14, 2025). Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar (Calendar No. 185).
  • Companion House bill: H.R. 2827.

Note on other materials included

  • The packet also contains: (a) a Massachusetts state bill labeled “Senate No. 550” regarding statewide planning for end‑of‑life solar photovoltaic panels and energy storage batteries (requires the state department to develop a plan and report by July 1, 2026); and (b) assorted legislative actions and sponsor lists that appear to mix federal and state items. These are separate measures in different jurisdictions and are not part of the federal S. 550 summarized above. Confirm the bill’s jurisdiction and official text before relying on a particular version.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.