WeVote

Bill

Bill

A 8263

Relates to requiring training of police department personnel on the protocols of the address confidentiality program

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Keith Brown and 3 co-sponsors

Requires mandatory training for police on Address Confidentiality Program (ACP) protocols to safeguard participant addresses and improve confidentiality in investigations.

REPORTED REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 8263

Summary: Bill A 8263 – Training on Address Confidentiality Program Protocols

Overview

Bill A 8263, introduced May 5, 2025, would require training for police department personnel on the protocols of the Address Confidentiality Program (ACP). The measure is currently in the legislative pipeline and has been reported and referred to the Ways and Means committee, indicating potential consideration of fiscal implications.

Purpose and Intent

  • The primary aim is to ensure that law enforcement personnel are knowledgeable about how the ACP operates and how to protect the confidentiality of program participants.
  • By standardizing training, the bill seeks to improve the accuracy of handling ACP requests, confidentiality safeguards, and coordination between police departments and ACP administrators.

Key Provisions (as described by the bill’s title and status)

Note: the exact text of provisions would be in the bill language; the following reflects the likely core elements based on the bill’s purpose.

  • Mandatory training: Police department personnel would be required to complete training on ACP protocols.
  • Training topics (likely, though specifics would be in the text): how the ACP functions, eligibility and enrollment of participants, maintaining confidential addresses, procedures for documenting ACP status in records, and safeguarding participant information during investigations and case handling.
  • Implementation scope: The training requirement would apply to relevant police departments within the jurisdiction covered by the bill.
  • Administration and administration timing: Details on who administers the training, frequency (initial and ongoing), and any recertification requirements would be defined in the bill.

Affected Parties and Impacts

  • Primary: Police departments and their personnel, who would receive mandated ACP protocol training.
  • ACP participants and beneficiaries: Potentially enhanced confidentiality and more consistent law enforcement handling of ACP-related matters.
  • State and local governments: Possible training program costs, staff time, and resource allocation to comply with the new requirement (a consideration given the bill’s referral to Ways and Means).

Procedural and Timeline Notes

  • Introduced: May 5, 2025.
  • Legislative actions: Referred to Codes on May 5, 2025; subsequently reported and referred to Ways and Means on May 28, 2025 (with two entries indicating committee actions on the same date).
  • Status: REPORTED REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS, suggesting a budgetary/financial review component is anticipated.

Sponsors

  • Primary sponsor: John Zaccaro Jr.
  • Cosponsors: MaryJane Shimsky, Keith Brown, Karines Reyes

Next Steps

  • The bill would proceed through further committee review and floor action. If passed, it would typically go to the governor for signature or veto. The Ways and Means referral indicates that fiscal impacts (training costs, program administration) will be examined before final consideration.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.