WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 2696

Relates to proof of claims for unjust conviction and imprisonment

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Brad Hoylman-Sigal

The bill standardizes school library material selection and requires transparent, age-appropriate criteria with procedural safeguards before removing contested materials.

REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCE
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 2696

Summary — S.2696 (2025) — "An Act regarding free expression" (Massachusetts Senate No. 2696)

Note: Metadata supplied with this file includes a different short title (“Relates to proof of claims for unjust conviction and imprisonment”), but the bill text and official heading identify it as “An Act regarding free expression.” This summary follows the bill text.

Purpose and intent

The bill establishes statewide procedures and protections governing the selection, retention, and challenge of library materials in public K–12 school libraries and offers related guidance and duties for public (municipal) libraries. Its stated intent is to protect professional judgment in library material selection, limit removals based on personal/political/doctrinal views, increase transparency, and provide procedural safeguards for challenged materials.

Key provisions (by statutory change)

Section 1 — Amendments to Chapter 71 (education)
- Inserts new Sections 82A–82C:
- Section 82A
- Selection of school library materials must be: age-appropriate, serve an educational purpose, and be based on the selecting employee’s professional training (not personal/political/doctrinal views).
- Definitions: “school library” includes municipal, regional, independent vocational, and county vocational/agricultural schools.
- A challenged material cannot be removed except after: notice, a public hearing, appointment of a school personnel review committee (by school committee and superintendent), and a school committee vote finding the material devoid of educational/literary/artistic/personal/social value or not age-appropriate for any attending child.
- Decisions to remove may be challenged by student/parent/guardian via petition for writ of mandamus in the Supreme Judicial Court or Superior Court.
- Allows routine removal for obsolescence or replacement, provided removal is not for prohibited reasons (personal/political/doctrinal).
- Section 82B
- Requires each school district, charter school, and local education agency to adopt a written library policy covering material selection, facility use, and challenge-response procedures.
- Policies must follow American Library Association (ALA) standards, be posted online, and require challenged materials remain on shelves pending the full challenge process and school committee vote.
- The Board of Library Commissioners (through the Massachusetts Library System) must provide resources and sample policies.
- Annual reporting to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education on all challenges during the previous calendar year.
- Section 82C
- Protects school employees from loss of license, certification, dismissal, discipline, adverse employment actions, fines, or imprisonment for selecting library materials made in good faith and consistent with the required policy.

Sections 2–10 — Technical and gender-neutral edits to Chapter 78
- Replace gendered terms (e.g., “chairman,” “his,” “him,” “selectmen”) with neutral alternatives (“chair,” “the member’s,” “select board,” etc.).

Section 11 — Board of Library Commissioners support
- Mandates the board make resources available to assist municipal public libraries in creating/modifying written policies for selection, collection development, use of materials/facilities, and responding to challenges consistent with ALA standards and section 19B.

Section 12 — Amendments to section 19B (partial, truncated in supplied text)
- Replaces clause (7) with two clauses requiring: (a) reporting nonresident loans/circulation as a percentage of total circulation (certified and auditable); and (b) adoption and publication of a written policy for selection and use of library materials (text truncated).

Who is affected

  • Primary: students, parents/guardians, school library teachers and other school employees responsible for library selection, school committees, superintendents, and district/charter/local education agencies.
  • Secondary: municipal public libraries and their boards/trustees, the Board of Library Commissioners and Massachusetts Library System, and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
  • Potentially affected: courts (mandamus petitions), and labor/HR due to procedural employment protections.

Procedural / timeline status (selected milestones)

  • Introduced: September 3, 2025; referred to Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
  • Reported and recommended as a new draft by Senate Ways & Means: November 6, 2025.
  • Floor actions (Nov 13, 2025): Multiple amendments considered; several amendments adopted (e.g., #1 Creem, #2 Keenan, #4 Creem, #5 DiDomenico, #6 Comerford, #7 Rodrigues) while many others were rejected; substituted for S.2328; ordered to third reading, read third, reprinted as amended (see S.2726).
  • Status shown: REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCE (May 12, 2025 entry appears in the record).

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Strengthens procedural protections for library professionals and reduces immediate removal of contested materials.
  • Increases administrative and reporting obligations for school districts, charter schools, and libraries.
  • Could lead to increased litigation (mandamus challenges) where school committees remove materials.
  • Anchoring policies to ALA standards standardizes selection/response practices but may prompt local debates about interpretation and age-appropriateness.
  • Clarifications in chapter 78 modernize language and expand state support to municipal libraries for policy development.

Sponsors and related bills

  • Sponsors listed in provided data: Alex Padilla (primary), Brad Hoylman-Sigal (primary), Todd Young (cosponsor). (Note: these names may not align with typical Massachusetts Senate membership in the bill header.)
  • Related prior-session bills: S.8081 and S.893.

If you want, I can:
- Extract the full, final text of the amended S.2696 / S.2726 for closer review.
- Prepare a one-page brief on likely legal challenges and constitutional considerations (e.g., First Amendment, due process).

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.