WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 2472

Relates to prohibiting horizontal drilling and high-volume hydraulic fracturing

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Kevin Parker

Massachusetts Senate resolution urges Congress and the President to admit Washington, D.C. as a state and oppose federal meddling in DC home rule; symbolic, seeks federal action.

REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 2472

Summary — S.2472 (Senate Docket No. 1494)

Note on source inconsistencies
- The metadata supplied with your request (title: “Relates to prohibiting horizontal drilling and high‑volume hydraulic fracturing”; sponsors: U.S./other-state legislators; committee referrals including Armed Services) is inconsistent with the bill text you provided.
- The actual bill text filed as Senate Docket No. 1494 / S.2472 (filed 01/16/2025) is a Massachusetts Senate resolution expressing support for admitting Washington, D.C. as a state. This summary describes the content of that resolution.

Purpose and intent
- S.2472 is a non‑binding state resolution in the Massachusetts General Court that proclaims the Commonwealth’s support for admitting Washington, D.C. into the Union as a state (to be known as the State of Washington, D.C.).
- It also expresses opposition to federal actions that interfere with D.C. home rule, such as congressional legislation disapproving or amending local D.C. laws and federal budget riders that restrict use of locally raised tax revenue.

Key provisions / substantive points
- Recitals: The resolution recounts historical and legal background (Residence Act, District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801, Twenty‑Third Amendment, Delegate to the House, Home Rule Act of 1973) and documents instances where Congress has overridden or restricted D.C. local decisions or used budget riders to limit local policy.
- Cites local expression of support: Notes D.C. referendum results (November 8, 2016) where 85.69% of voters supported admission as a state and approved a proposed state constitution and boundaries.
- Federal legislative context: References passage of the Washington, D.C. Admission Act by the U.S. House on June 26, 2020 and April 22, 2021, and that Congress has not yet enacted full statehood.
- Resolutions (operative clauses):
- Declares that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts supports admitting Washington, D.C. into the Union as a state.
- Declares that the Commonwealth opposes congressional or presidential interference with D.C. local self‑government (including disapproval/amendment of local actions and budget riders) and calls on Congress and the President to enact federal legislation granting D.C. statehood.

Who would be affected / impact
- Direct legal effect: None — this is a state legislative resolution (symbolic and advisory) and does not change federal law or admit a state.
- Practical/political effects: It communicates Massachusetts’ official position to Congress, the President, D.C. officials, and the public; it can be used to build political momentum for federal legislation authorizing D.C. statehood.
- Stakeholders: residents of the District of Columbia (approx. 700,000), Massachusetts legislators and electorate, U.S. Congress, President, and organizations engaged in the statehood debate.

Procedural / timeline notes (from provided record)
- Filed: 01/16/2025 (Senate Docket No. 1494). Presented by Senator Patricia D. Jehlen (petitioners also listed: James B. Eldridge; Dylan A. Fernandes).
- Committee referrals and actions in the record are inconsistent/duplicative: entries list referral to Veterans and Federal Affairs (02/27/2025), referral to Environmental Conservation (01/21/2025), “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services” (07/28/2025), and hearing scheduling entries for 11/13/2025. The House is noted as having “concurred” on 02/27/2025.
- Related or preceding measures listed: SD 1494 (replaces), and prior‑session bills S.6906, S.4099, S.7970.

Bottom line
- S.2472 is a Massachusetts Senate resolution urging federal action to admit Washington, D.C. as a state and opposing federal interference with D.C. local governance. It is a political/expressive measure rather than binding law; its principal effect is to register Massachusetts’ support and seek to influence federal decision‑makers.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.