Relates to labor peace agreements and the cannabis industry wage board; repealer
Creates a state wage board to study and set cannabis industry wages, increases licensee transparency, and strengthens labor peace, equity, and license oversight.
Creates a state wage board to study and set cannabis industry wages, increases licensee transparency, and strengthens labor peace, equity, and license oversight.
Bill S 10643 (New York, 2025-2026) introduces changes to the cannabis law and the labor law related to labor peace agreements, license oversight, and the creation of a state cannabis industry wage board. It also repeals a prior provision related to labor peace agreements. The act aims to affect license certification, ongoing conditions of licensure, transparency of ownership and compensation, and the establishment of a wage-setting process for cannabis industry workers.
Subdivision 29 of section 3 of the cannabis law is repealed.
License review and modifications (cannabis law §10(24))
Two years after the first retail sale, the cannabis wage industry board must review licenses with substantial market share to assess impact on:
The board may modify license terms to better achieve these goals; licensees can appeal for a formal hearing.
Reviews must consider violations of state labor law and labor peace agreements.
An existing collective bargaining agreement cannot be infringed or voided if a licensee’s market share is reduced.
License applicant disclosures (cannabis law §35(1)(a) amended)
Adds new information requirements for applicants:
Additional qualification standards (cannabis law §35(1)(a) amended)
Adds good moral character and reiterates labor peace agreement considerations as part of registration conditions, with ongoing material conditions modified accordingly.
Repeals previous explicit reference to labor peace agreement maintenance as an ongoing condition in certain subsections, while keeping related safeguards.
Renewal criteria (cannabis law §35(6)(a)) and suspension/termination (cannabis law §35(7))
Renewal decisions may consider compliance with state laws and public-interest factors, including whether there is an excess of registered organizations in a given area.
Previously explicit grounds related to labor peace agreements in renewal are revised; other grounds for refusal or suspension may apply, including cross-jurisdictional violations.
Labor law reference (labor law §64(1)(i) renamed)
Replaces the direct requirement of a labor peace agreement with a consideration of whether applicants have a construction union agreement for construction-related licensed facilities when there are 25+ employees.
Repeal and new data disclosure (cannabis law §66 and new §66(5))
Repeals §66(5) and adds a new disclosure requirement:
Information to be publicly posted on the agency’s website.
Creation of a cannabis industry wage board (new §§ 665)
Establishes a three-member wage board:
First hearing required by March 1, 2027; no salary, but travel expenses reimbursed.
Quorum: two-thirds of board members.
Authority to hold public hearings, issue subpoenas, and take depositions; shall determine procedures independently of common procedural rules.
Required minimum three in-state hearings with bilingual accessibility (Spanish; interpreter for other languages as needed).
Board to publish a report with wage recommendations by December 31, 2027, covering:
Recommendations are non-diminishing to existing rights and protections for cannabis workers.
The commissioner must respond under existing wage-related law and may reconvene or appoint a new wage board to implement or adjust recommendations.
S 10643 seeks to intensify oversight of cannabis licensing with a focus on labor peace agreements, transparency of ownership and compensation, and equity in market participation. It creates a state wage board to study and propose industry-wide wages, requiring inclusive public hearings and bilingual accessibility. It also expands disclosure requirements for licensees and broadens the framework for license renewal and potential modifications to address social equity and labor standards, while aligning with existing labor and regulatory structures.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.