WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 2542

Relates to including the illegal conversions of dwelling units in the definition of harassment

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Cordell Cleare and 4 co-sponsors

Mass Ready authorizes about $2.9 billion to fund climate resilience, water protection, land conservation, and local infrastructure projects across Massachusetts.

REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO CODES
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 2542

Summary — S 2542: "Mass Ready — An Act to Build Resilience for Massachusetts Communities"

Note: The file materials provided include conflicting metadata (an initial short title about "including the illegal conversions of dwelling units in the definition of harassment" and a sponsors list that appears to name federal senators). The body of the bill text and governor’s transmittal clearly describe a Commonwealth of Massachusetts capital/authorization package titled “Mass Ready: An Act to Build Resilience for Massachusetts Communities.” This summary treats the bill as that Commonwealth resilience/capital authorization measure. Confirm details on the official Massachusetts Legislature website for final text and sponsors.

Purpose / Intent

S 2542 (Mass Ready) is a statewide capital and policy package to finance climate adaptation, resilience, environmental protection, and related infrastructure improvements in Massachusetts. The bill seeks to authorize approximately $2.9 billion in capital spending (state authorizations) to strengthen infrastructure, protect water and natural resources, invest in farms and local economies, and accelerate nature‑based resilience projects. It is declared an emergency law to make financing and reforms effective immediately.

Key provisions and policy changes

  • Capital authorizations (~$2.9 billion) to the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) for resilience and environmental projects.
  • Flood control & coastal resilience: over $600 million for dams, seawalls, and nature‑based defenses; requires flood risk disclosures in real estate transactions.
  • Water and contamination response:
    • $385 million for the Clean Water Trust (clean water infrastructure; PFAS remediation and utility upgrades).
    • $120 million authorized for the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for PFAS management.
  • Conservation, land and biodiversity:
    • $220.5 million for land conservation, forest and habitat restoration.
    • $20 million to implement Executive Order 618 (Biodiversity goals).
    • Updates to Current Use tax program to recognize carbon sequestration on working forests.
  • Food, farms and local economies:
    • $315 million for Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) grants.
    • $125 million for the Food Security Infrastructure Grant (FSIG) program.
    • Updates to farm policy (animal health and food safety enforcement) and expansion of the Food Policy Council.
  • Pollution, waste and enforcement:
    • $42 million for Superfund site response.
    • $28 million for solid waste management, including illegal waste disposal responses.
    • $9 million to modernize environmental law enforcement.
  • Programmatic and administrative reforms:
    • Create a Resilience Revolving Fund (loan model for local shovel‑ready projects).
    • Capitalize a Transfer of Development Rights Fund.
    • Establish a Commonwealth Port Sustainability Commission to guide port-area planning.
    • Enable road transfers from DCR to MassDOT/municipalities.
    • Update composition/charge of the Building Code Board of Appeals and BBRS to add climate/housing/design expertise.
    • Permit streamlining and expedited pathways for qualifying nature‑based resilience projects (e.g., marsh restoration, dam removal) under Chapter 91 and the Wetlands Protection Act.
  • Emergency clause: bill declared necessary for immediate preservation of public convenience.

Who is affected

  • Municipal governments and regional authorities (grant/loan recipients; infrastructure owners).
  • State agencies: EEA, DEP, DFG, DCR, MassDOT, BBRS, Building Code Board of Appeals.
  • Homeowners, real‑estate buyers/sellers (flood risk disclosure requirement).
  • Farmers, food processors and the Food Policy Council.
  • Conservation organizations, land trusts, and natural resource managers.
  • Communities near Superfund sites, flood‑prone coastal and river areas.
  • Utilities and drinking/clean water systems (Clean Water Trust financing).

Funding and amounts (selected)

  • Total authorization: ~$2.9 billion
  • Flood/coastal resilience: > $600 million
  • Clean Water Trust: $385 million
  • DEP PFAS management: $120 million
  • MVP: $315 million
  • FSIG: $125 million
  • Conservation/open space: $220.5 million
  • Superfund: $42 million
  • Solid waste: $28 million
  • Environmental law enforcement: $9 million
  • Biodiversity/EO 618 implementation: $20 million

Procedural status and timeline (as provided)

  • Filed with Governor’s transmittal: June 24, 2025; Governor’s message: June 26, 2025.
  • Introduced in Senate: July 30, 2025; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (per provided log).
  • Earlier committee referrals and hearings listed (Environment & Natural Resources; Housing, Construction & Community Development; Codes) and hearings scheduled for July 15, 2025 (multiple time updates noted).
  • Recorded status entries include “REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO CODES” (02/03/2025 entries appear inconsistent with later dates).
  • Given the emergency clause, if enacted the bill’s provisions would take effect immediately.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Accelerates state investment in climate adaptation, potentially reducing future disaster recovery costs and improving community resilience.
  • Provides targeted support for small municipalities and for PFAS remediation and water infrastructure.
  • Permitting and board membership reforms aim to speed climate‑resilient and housing‑related projects but may raise implementation oversight and procedural questions.
  • Flood disclosure requirements will affect real estate transactions and could influence housing market perceptions in flood‑exposed areas.
  • The bill authorizes funding rather than direct expenditures — actual projects depend on subsequent appropriations, grant rules, and implementation timelines.

If you want, I can:
- Produce a one‑page legislative brief for distribution to municipal officials or stakeholders.
- Extract and summarize only the funding tables or the permitting/administrative reform sections in greater detail.
- Verify sponsors and procedural history against the official Massachusetts legislative website and provide an updated status log.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.