WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 233

Relates to establishing a task force on safety in school transportation

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Karl Brabenec and 20 co-sponsors

Establishes a state task force on school transportation safety to study practices, solicit input, and issue recommendations to improve safety for students, drivers, and districts.

PRINT NUMBER 233B
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 233

Summary — A.233 (Print 233B)

Title: Relates to establishing a task force on safety in school transportation
Primary sponsor: Assemblyman Christopher Eachus (cosponsors listed below)
Status: Print Number 233B — Referred and amended in Assembly Education Committee

Purpose / Intent

A.233 would create a state-level task force charged with examining safety issues in school transportation and producing recommendations to improve the safety of students who use school buses and other school-provided transportation. The bill aims to centralize expert review, identify gaps in policy or practice, and recommend changes to law, regulation, funding, training, or equipment related to school transportation safety.

What the bill does (known and typical elements)

The legislative summary provided indicates establishment of a task force but does not include full text. Based on the bill title and standard practice for such measures, A.233 is expected to do the following:

  • Establish a multi-stakeholder task force on school transportation safety (composition typically includes state education and transportation officials, representatives of school districts, bus operators, law enforcement, parent or student advocates, labor representatives, and safety experts).
  • Define the task force's duties (review current statutes/regulations/practices, analyze accident and incident data, assess equipment and training needs, identify best practices).
  • Require the task force to hold public meetings and solicit input from school districts, drivers, parents, students, and vendors.
  • Direct the task force to prepare and submit a written report with findings and recommendations to the Governor and the Legislature within a specified time period (typical bills set a deadline such as 6–12 months after first meeting).
  • Provide for administrative support (often from the State Education Department or another designated agency) and may authorize limited reimbursement for certain task force members.

Note: The bill text is not included here; the above reflects common structural elements for task force bills and should be confirmed against the enacted language.

Who would be affected

  • State agencies (Education, Transportation, Motor Vehicle/Traffic enforcement) — for participation and implementation of recommendations.
  • School districts and BOCES — which may be asked to implement recommended changes (training, equipment upgrades, policy updates).
  • Bus drivers, attendants, and contractors — potential changes in training, certification, or operational protocols.
  • Students, families, and parent organizations — potential improvements in safety and processes for reporting concerns.
  • Vendors/manufacturers of school buses and safety equipment — potential effects if equipment standards are recommended.

Legislative status and timeline

  • Introduced: January 8, 2025 (Referred to Assembly Education)
  • Print activity and amendments:
    • April 3, 2025 — Printed as A.233A; amended and recommitted to Education
    • April 14, 2025 — Printed as A.233B; amended and recommitted to Education
  • The bill is currently in the Assembly Education Committee (as of the print dates above). No final floor action has been recorded in the provided history.

Sponsors and related bills

  • Primary sponsor: Christopher Eachus. Multiple bipartisan cosponsors listed including Judy Griffin, Angelo Santabarbara, Nader Sayegh, MaryJane Shimsky, and others.
  • Companion/related Senate bill: S.3071 (companion). Prior-session related bills listed (S652, S2482, S4683, S6687, A7459).

Potential impact and considerations

  • If implemented, the task force could produce actionable recommendations leading to improved safety protocols, targeted funding requests, legislative changes, or administrative rulemaking.
  • Administrative or fiscal impacts will depend on the task force’s recommendations (e.g., requirements for new equipment, expanded training, or enforcement changes could carry costs for districts and the State).
  • Stakeholder engagement would be important to ensure recommendations are practical and fiscally feasible for diverse districts (urban, suburban, rural).

Next steps for readers tracking A.233

  • Watch for the Assembly Education Committee report or bill memo associated with Print 233B for full text and specific provisions.
  • Monitor companion Senate bill S.3071 for parallel action.
  • If interested in influencing outcomes, consider contacting committee members, the bill sponsor, or submitting comments during public hearings.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.