WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 7417

Relates to directing the state commissioner of parks, recreation and historic preservation to create a process to approve or deny certain new large urban telecommunication infrastructure

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Brad Hoylman-Sigal

Directs NY Parks Commissioner to create a formal review process for urban telecom infrastructure, weighing impacts on parks and historic resources against project needs.

REFERRED TO CULTURAL AFFAIRS, TOURISM, PARKS AND RECREATION
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 7417

Summary of S 7417 (New York)

Overview

  • Bill Number: S 7417
  • Title: Relates to directing the state commissioner of parks, recreation and historic preservation to create a process to approve or deny certain new large urban telecommunication infrastructure
  • Sponsor: Brad Hoylman-Sigal (primary)
  • Status: Referred to Cultural Affairs, Tourism, Parks and Recreation
  • Introduced: April 15, 2025
  • Related House Companion: A 8122 (companion)

Purpose and Intent

S 7417 directs the state Commissioner of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to develop a formal process for evaluating and deciding on certain new large urban telecommunication infrastructure projects. The bill aims to establish a structured review pathway to approve or deny these projects, presumably with consideration of impacts on parks, historic resources, and related public space concerns. The exact criteria, thresholds, and procedures would be defined in the implementing process created by the commissioner (not provided in the available summary).

Key Provisions (as currently described)

  • Directs action: The bill requires the state commissioner to create a review/approval-denial process specifically for “certain new large urban telecommunication infrastructure.”
  • Scope and standards: While not specified in the summary, the intended process would likely specify eligibility (which projects count as “large urban”), review criteria (e.g., effects on parks, historic preservation, aesthetics, public use), timelines, and decision-making authorities.
  • Governance: The responsibility rests with the state’s commissioner of parks, recreation and historic preservation; potential integration with existing agency processes and state planning goals.

Note: The full text would clarify definitions (e.g., what qualifies as “large urban telecommunication infrastructure”), procedural steps (applications, notices, public input, appeals), timelines, and any fees or fiscal implications.

Who Would Be Affected

  • State agency: Office of the Commissioner of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation would lead the new process.
  • Telecommunication providers and developers proposing large urban infrastructure projects.
  • Local governments and affected communities where projects may be sited, particularly in or near parks and historic resources.
  • Property owners and managers within project areas.
  • General public, who may gain greater input opportunities or protections for parks and historic resources.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and referral: The bill was introduced on April 15, 2025 and referred to the Cultural Affairs, Tourism, Parks and Recreation committee.
  • Action timeline: No further committee actions or enacted text are provided in the summary. A companion bill exists in the Assembly (A 8122), suggesting cross-chamber consideration may occur.

Potential Impacts and Considerations

  • Policy aim: To protect parks and historic resources while accommodating needs for large urban telecom infrastructure.
  • Operational effect: Creation of a formal, agency-led review process could influence project timelines, require new disclosure/criteria, and potentially add review steps for certain projects.
  • Balance considerations: The process will likely weigh infrastructure needs against conservation, preservation, aesthetics, and public access.

Next Steps

  • Review the full bill text, committee memo, and fiscal notes once released to confirm definitions, criteria, timelines, and any required funding.
  • Monitor the companion Assembly bill (A 8122) for parallel provisions and potential alignment.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.