WeVote

Bill

Bill

A 11225

Relates to contracts by service-disabled veteran-owned business enterprises

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Michael Cashman and 4 co-sponsors

New York must aim for eight percent SDVOB participation in state contracts, up from six percent, effective immediately.

REFERRED TO PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 11225

Summary of Bill A 11225 (2025-2026) – New York

Purpose and intent

  • The bill amends the New York Veterans’ Services Law to establish a statewide target for participation of service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOBs) in state contracts.
  • Specifically, it sets a statewide goal of eight percent participation for SDVOBs on state contracts, replacing the prior target of six percent.

Key provisions and changes

  • Section amended: Paragraph (c) of subdivision 1 of section 42 of the Veterans’ Services Law.
  • New target: The state must strive to achieve an eight percent participation rate of service-disabled veteran-owned business enterprises on state contracts.
  • Effective date: The act takes effect immediately upon enactment.

who/what is affected

  • Service-disabled veteran-owned business enterprises (SDVOBs) seeking to secure contracts with New York State.
  • State agencies and authorities that procure goods and services through state contracts, as the updated goal applies to participation in state contracting.
  • Compliance and reporting frameworks within state procurement processes, which would be aligned to pursue the higher eight percent target.

Procedural and timeline details

  • Bill status history indicates passage in the Assembly (May 28, 2026) and referral/tracking through Senate committees (Procurement and Contracts), with subsequent movements toward final enactment.
  • There is no phased timeline specified within the bill text itself; the eight percent goal is presented as the statewide mandate, effective immediately.

Additional notes

  • Co-sponsors include Judy Griffin, Angelo Santabarbara, Michael Cashman, Tommy John Schiavoni, and Steve Stern.
  • The bill is a straightforward expansion of the SDVOB contracting goal, without other substantive changes to program structure or eligibility criteria, based on the text provided.

Implications

  • State agencies may need to adjust procurement planning, outreach, and contract oversight to meet the higher eight percent SDVOB target.
  • Increased emphasis on SDVOB participation could lead to more contract opportunities and potential requirements for SDVOB certification, subcontracting, and reporting data to monitor compliance.
  • The change aims to broaden economic opportunities for service-disabled veterans and enhance diversity and inclusion within state contracting.

If you’d like, I can compare this bill to existing NY SDVOB policies or provide a brief stakeholder impact analysis.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.