Bill
A 8291
Revises rules on rent abatements for housing maintenance code violations, clarifying how tenants seek reductions and how courts determine and grant relief.
Title: Relates to actions and proceedings seeking an abatement of rent based on violations of the housing maintenance code
Introduced: May 9, 2025
Status: Print No. 8291B — Referred to Judiciary; amended and recommitted (May 16 & May 28, 2025)
Sponsor: Jo Anne Simon; Cosponsors: Micah Lasher, Karines Reyes
Companion: S.7633
The bill concerns civil actions and judicial proceedings in which tenants seek a reduction (abatement) of rent because of landlord violations of the housing maintenance code. Its stated aim is to modify how such abatement claims are handled procedurally and/or substantively so that tenants and courts have clearer rules for pursuing rent abatements where housing conditions violate applicable health and safety standards.
The available metadata (title and bill history) indicates the bill revises the law governing:
- When and how a tenant may seek rent abatement for housing maintenance code violations;
- Procedures and standards governing such court actions or proceedings (e.g., evidentiary issues, jurisdiction, burden of proof, remedies);
- Interaction between municipal enforcement of housing code violations and private tenant actions.
Note: The posted PDF content in the legislative file provided to me is not readable in plain text here. The summary above is therefore based on the bill title, sponsors and legislative actions. For exact statutory language and precise changes, consult the official bill text (A.8291B) on the legislature’s website.
When reading the bill, check for provisions that typically appear in abatement legislation:
- Scope: which types of housing maintenance code violations qualify (e.g., heat, hot water, pests, structural hazards);
- Remedies: how abatement is calculated (percentage reduction, pro rata rent), whether retroactive rent abatement is allowed;
- Procedural rules: where actions may be brought (Housing Court vs. civil court), required notice to landlord, timelines, joinder of actions;
- Evidence and findings: who bears the burden of proof, presumptions based on municipal violations or housing inspections;
- Escrow, withholding, and rent stays: whether tenants may withhold rent or must pay into escrow pending determination;
- Fees and enforcement: awarding of attorney’s fees, civil penalties, injunctive relief, enforcement by housing agencies;
- Relationship to existing tenant protections and local enforcement programs.
Depending on the final text, the bill could make it clearer and possibly easier for tenants to obtain rent reductions when municipal or housing-code violations persist; it could change how judges calculate abatements and how landlords are notified and given opportunity to cure. It may also affect the interplay between municipal enforcement actions and private civil claims.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
