WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 1077

REGULATION-TECH

104th Regular Session Introduced by John Curran

Arizona restricts private prison contracts by requiring financial/insurance transparency, limits core custodial authority, and caps price increases to CPI with state oversight and

Rule 3-9(a) / Re-referred to Assignments
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1077

SB 1077 — "Private Prison Contract Reform Act" (Introduced version)

Note: the materials provided appear to include text fragments from multiple jurisdictions (an Arizona bill amending ARS §41‑1609.01 and unrelated Illinois/Hawaii bill metadata). This summary focuses on the Arizona bill text (amendment to ARS 41‑1609.01) titled the "Private Prison Contract Reform Act."

Main purpose

To revise the statutory requirements and limits for state contracts with private providers of adult correctional services (private/prison contractors), increase financial and insurance accountability, restrict delegation of certain custodial and sentencing authorities, and set procedural and pricing limits on such contracts.

Key provisions (what the bill changes or requires)

  • Reference and review

    • Requires published requests for proposals (RFPs) to be provided to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee for review.

  • Proposer terminology and qualification standard

    • Changes language from "proposer" to "proposing entity."
    • Allows a proposing entity to satisfy the “history of successful operation” requirement by relying on the demonstrated experience of its personnel (rather than only facilities operated directly by the entity).

  • Contract cancellation

    • State may cancel a contract anytime after the first year without penalty by giving 90 days’ written notice.

  • Price/cost adjustments

    • Annual adjustments allowed once per year on the contract anniversary.
    • Any adjustment may not exceed the percent change in the U.S. Consumer Price Index (BLS) between the latest and prior calendar year.
    • Any alternative adjustment mechanism must be specifically authorized by the Legislature (and funded if necessary).

  • Contract term limits

    • Contracts may have an initial term of up to 10 years (overriding ARS §41‑2546).
    • Initial contracts may include options to renew for two additional periods of up to 5 years each.

  • Financial, insurance and reimbursement requirements

    • Contractor must provide audited financial statements for the previous five years (or for each year in operation if less than five).
    • Contractor must present an adequate insurance plan, explicitly including coverage for civil‑rights claims, approved by the state’s Risk Management Division.
    • Contractor agrees to be liable for and to reimburse the state or political subdivisions for costs of emergency, public‑safety, or security services provided to the contractor.

  • Sovereign immunity / liability

    • The state’s sovereign immunity does not apply to the contractor; neither the contractor nor its insurer may assert sovereign immunity in actions arising from contract performance.

  • Prohibited delegations of authority

    • Contracts must not delegate to private contractors authority to:
    • Develop/implement inmate release-date calculations.
    • Develop/implement sentencing-credit calculations/awards.
    • Approve inmate work types or set wages/sentence credits for inmate work.
    • Grant/deny/revoke sentence credits, change custody levels, or take disciplinary actions.

  • Proposal acceptance criteria

    • Awards cannot be made unless an “acceptable proposal” is received (substantially meets statutory and RFP requirements).
    • Proposals must offer cost savings to the state and provide services at least functionally equal to those the state would provide.

Who is affected

  • Private correctional contractors and their insurers.
  • Arizona Department of Corrections and other state agencies that contract for incarceration services.
  • County and municipal governments that may provide emergency or public‑safety services to contracted facilities.
  • Incarcerated individuals indirectly (through restrictions on contractor authority over release/credits/discipline).

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Increases contractor financial transparency and insurance/ liability exposure.
  • Limits private contractors’ control over core custodial and sentencing functions, preserving state responsibility for those decisions.
  • Caps contract cost growth to CPI unless the Legislature approves otherwise.
  • Could discourage some private providers (longer contract terms allowed but greater liability and oversight).
  • Potential fiscal effects include increased litigation exposure, but also possible savings via required cost‑savings proposals and state cancellation right.

Procedural status (as provided)

  • Introduced: February 4, 2025.
  • Read, referred to committees, and on April 11, 2025 listed as: Rule 3‑9(a) / Re‑referred to Assignments.
  • Additional committee and reading actions listed (see legislative record for the authoritative, current status).

If you want, I can:
- Produce a short one‑page explainer for policymakers or the public.
- Compare this draft to current ARS §41‑1609.01 to show exact statutory text changes.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.