WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

ACR 116

Recognizes Prince Hall as Revolutionary Era activist and founder of "Prince Hall Freemasonry."

2026-2027 Regular Session Introduced by Linda Carter and 2 co-sponsors

New Jersey concurrent resolution honors Prince Hall, Revolutionary War activist and founder of African American Masonic fraternal organization, for historical contributions.

Introduced, Referred to Assembly Tourism, Gaming and the Arts Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · ACR 116

Legislative bill overview

ACR 116 is a concurrent resolution that officially recognizes Prince Hall as a Revolutionary Era activist and the founder of Prince Hall Freemasonry. The resolution honors his historical contributions to American independence and the development of African American fraternal organizations. This is a ceremonial bill with no binding legal force or budgetary implications.

Why is this important

Prince Hall Freemasonry represents one of the earliest African American civic and social organizations, founded during a period of severe racial restrictions when Black men were excluded from white Masonic lodges. Recognition of Hall's legacy affirms the historical role of African Americans in the Revolutionary War and the founding of independent institutions that provided community support, education, and mutual aid when excluded from mainstream society. The resolution contributes to historical accuracy and cultural acknowledgment in state records.

Potential points of contention

  • Historical documentation disputes: Some scholars debate the exact details of Prince Hall's life and Revolutionary activities, as primary sources are limited; the resolution's specific claims may reflect one historical interpretation among competing narratives
  • Purpose of legislative time: Critics may argue that concurrent resolutions honoring historical figures consume legislative resources better spent on substantive policy matters, though supporters counter that historical recognition serves important cultural functions
  • Sectarian considerations: Some may question whether the state should formally recognize fraternal or secret organizations, though this resolution merely acknowledges historical significance rather than endorsing Freemasonry itself

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.