WeVote

Bill

Bill

H 3905

Recognize Reverend Venus Young for his service to the community

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Terry Alexander and 121 co-sponsors

Allows Salem MA to install fixed automated speed cameras in designated school zones with 25 fine, owner liability rules, and civil enforcement.

Introduced and adopted
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 3905

Summary — H 3905

Status: Introduced (House Docket No. 4299); committee referral and actions noted.
Primary sponsors: Representative Manny Cruz; Senator Joan B. Lovely.
Classification: Local-authority enabling act / resolution (document contains two distinct items — see “Notes on document contents” below).

Main purpose and intent

The principal measure in the provided text is an act authorizing the City of Salem, Massachusetts, to use automated road safety camera systems to enforce speed limits in designated school zones. The stated intent is to promote traffic safety around schools by permitting fixed automated cameras that record speeding violations and create a civil enforcement process.

Key provisions and changes

Definitions
- “Automated Road Safety Camera System”: device that produces digital photographs and may record vehicle speed.
- “Camera Enforceable Violation”: limited to exceeding speed limits (cites sections 17 or 18 of chapter 90) while traveling in a “designated school zone.”
- “Designated School Zone”: within 300 feet of property comprising accredited preschools/Head Start/elementary/vocational/secondary schools, when violations occur between 5:00 a.m. and midnight (regardless of whether school is in session).

Authority and deployment
- The City of Salem may install automated cameras on ways under its control and, with written permission from the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, on commonwealth-controlled ways.
- Up to two fixed automated cameras may be used per designated school zone.

Enforcement, penalties, and process
- Maximum civil fine: $25 per violation.
- Liability generally attaches to the vehicle owner, except when the operator was issued a citation for the underlying violation (owner not liable if operator ticketed under chapter 90C).
- The city may issue written warnings for education.
- Notices must include recorded images/data, vehicle registration info, date/time/location, instructions for payment and contesting, and hearing info.
- Mailing timelines: within 14 days for Massachusetts-registered vehicles; within 21 days for out-of-state registrations.
- Owners have 60 days to pay or contest; undisputed late matters are subject to subsequent enforcement (text references subsection (l) for consequences).
- Several exceptions relieve owner liability (emergency vehicle passage, funeral procession, stolen vehicle, rental/leasing cases — procedure for rentals referenced in section 4 but text truncated).
- Violations issued under this chapter are not recorded on the operator’s driving record and do not count as a moving conviction for motor vehicle premium surcharge (chapter 175, section 113B).
- Photographic/digital evidence sworn by police or designee is prima facie evidence.
- Police department supervises the program and may hire staff or contract services to operate it.

Who is affected

  • City of Salem: gains authority to implement automated speed enforcement in school zones and to administer civil violations.
  • Motor vehicle operators and vehicle owners whose vehicles are recorded speeding in designated zones (civil fines and notice procedures).
  • Local police department: administrative and supervisory responsibilities.
  • Schools and communities near designated school zones: potential safety benefit from automated enforcement.
  • Camera vendors/contractors (possible contracting for equipment and services).

Procedural / timeline highlights

  • Filed as House Docket No. 4299 (filed 1/22/2025 in the MA House).
  • Referred to the House Committee on Transportation (3/13/2025).
  • Hearing scheduled for 06/03/2025 (11:00 AM–1:00 PM).
  • Senate concurrence recorded 04/10/2025.
  • Reporting date extended to 03/18/2026.
  • Related bill: HD 4299 (listed as replacing this filing).

Notes on document contents / apparent duplication

The package provided also contains text of a separate South Carolina House resolution honoring Pastor (Reverend) Venus Young of Bethlehem Baptist Church for long service. That resolution is ceremonial and unrelated to the Massachusetts automated-enforcement measure. The presence of both in the same document appears to be an aggregation/misfile; they should be treated as separate items:
- MA H 3905: substantive local enabling act for automated speed cameras in Salem.
- SC resolution: honorary recognition of Reverend Venus Young (ceremonial, no regulatory effect).

Limitations / missing material

  • The text references Section 4 (rental/lease procedures) and subsection (l) (post-60‑day consequences) but the provided content is truncated; full implementation details and appeal enforcement mechanics require those missing sections to be reviewed.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.