WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 3645

Read Act interventions modified.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Patty Mueller

Modifies Read Act interventions by updating how students are identified, when and how supports begin, and how progress is monitored and reported.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Education Policy
#educationandeducationdepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 3645

Summary of HF 3645 (Minnesota, 2025-2026): Read Act Interventions Modified

Overview

HF 3645, introduced in the Minnesota Legislature for the 2025-2026 session and referred to the Education Policy committee, proposes modifications to Read Act interventions. The bill has a co-sponsor: Patty Mueller. The Read Act currently governs early literacy screening, intervention processes, and supports for students who struggle with reading. This bill aims to adjust aspects of how interventions are triggered, delivered, and evaluated.

Note: This summary reflects the bill’s stated title and available action history. For precise statutory language, dates, and implementation details, consult the bill’s text as introduced and any subsequent amendments.

Purpose and intent

  • To modify the existing Read Act framework governing reading interventions for students who are not meeting grade-level reading benchmarks.
  • Aims to refine the identification, monitoring, and support mechanisms to improve literacy outcomes in the early grades.
  • Potentially seeks to adjust timelines, criteria, or resources associated with intervention services to align with updated standards or practices.

Key provisions and changes (as described in the bill title)

Because the available materials are limited to the title and introductory action history, the following provisions are inferred as typical targets for “Read Act interventions modified” bills. The exact text should be consulted for precise language, but likely areas of modification include:
- Identification criteria: Revisions to how students are identified as needing Read Act interventions (e.g., screening results, diagnostic assessments, or growth benchmarks).
- Intervention timing and duration: Changes to when interventions must begin after identification, and how long students must receive supports before assessing progression.
- Intervention strategies: Updates to approved intervention modalities (e.g., evidence-based reading programs, small-group instruction, or classroom-based supports) and the selection criteria for appropriate interventions.
- Monitoring and progress reporting: Enhanced or revised requirements for regular progress monitoring (e.g., benchmarks at set intervals, data reporting to families, or required documentation).
- Teacher and staff requirements: Adjustments to qualifications, professional development, or staffing ratios necessary to implement Read Act supports.
- Family and student involvement: Provisions governing communication with families about intervention plans and progress.
- Resource allocations: Changes to funding mechanics, if any, or guidance on how districts should allocate resources for literacy interventions.

Who would be affected

  • Schools and districts: Primary implementers of Read Act interventions; affected by any changes to timelines, required data collection, and intervention modalities.
  • Reading specialists and teachers: Potential changes in required qualifications, professional development, and instructional responsibilities.
  • Students in grades K-3 (and any applicable grades under Minnesota’s Read Act): Students identified as at risk for reading difficulties would be the direct recipients of revised interventions.
  • Families and guardians: Recipients of updated communication and involvement requirements related to intervention plans and progress.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Status: Introduction and first reading on 2026-02-23; referred to Education Policy, indicating initial committee review and consideration of the bill’s provisions.
  • Process trajectory: After introduction, the bill would typically undergo committee hearings, potential amendments, and votes in the House before moving to the Senate (and vice versa if a companion exists). Timelines depend on committee schedules and legislative priorities.
  • Implementation considerations: If enacted, districts may require transitional guidance to implement revised intervention protocols, along with any reporting or accountability adjustments tied to Read Act outcomes.

Why this matters

  • Literacy is foundational to academic achievement; changes to Read Act interventions can influence early cumulative learning, graduation readiness, and long-term educational outcomes.
  • Clearer or updated intervention rules can affect daily classroom practice, resource allocation, and family engagement around literacy.

If you’d like, I can pull the full bill text and provide a line-by-line comparison of changes from the current Read Act framework, along with potential fiscal implications and implementation timelines.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.