WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HJR 10

PURCHASE OF CARE PROVIDER REIMBURSEMENT RATES.

153rd General Assembly (2025-2026) Introduced by Mara Gorman and 7 co-sponsors

Delaware HJR 10 aims to guide how Purchase of Care provider reimbursement rates are set, possibly studying costs and promoting fair, quality-based pay.

Assigned to Appropriations Committee in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HJR 10

Summary: HJR 10 (Session 153, Delaware) – Purchase of Care Provider Reimbursement Rates

Overview

  • Bill type: Joint Resolution (HJR)
  • Title: Purchase of Care Provider Reimbursement Rates
  • Jurisdiction: Delaware
  • Session: 153
  • Introduced: April 14, 2026
  • Committee assignment: Health & Human Development Committee (House)
  • Sponsors: Primary and co-sponsors include Dave Wilson, Mara Gorman, Nicole Poore, Claire Snyder-Hall, Spiros Mantzavinos, Josue Ortega, Melanie Ross Levin, and Marie Pinkney

Purpose and Intent

  • The resolution seeks to address the framework or guidance around reimbursement rates for providers who participate in the Delaware Purchase of Care program (often a state-supported child care subsidy program). While the text of the resolution is not provided here, such Joint Resolutions typically:
    • Express the legislature’s policy preferences or authorize, support, or request actions related to adjusting reimbursement rates to ensure access to high-quality child care.
    • May request or direct state agencies to study, report, or adopt certain rate-setting methodologies or pricing standards.
    • Could set legislative support for aligning provider reimbursement with cost of care, market conditions, or quality improvements.

Key Provisions and Changes (Expected Based on Title)

  • Reimbursement Rate Policy: Establishes or endorses specific approaches to setting or adjusting reimbursement rates paid to child care providers under the Purchase of Care program.
  • Assessment of Costs: May require consideration of provider costs, including staff wages, benefits, facilities, and materials necessary to deliver care.
  • Quality Incentives: Potential inclusion of incentives that reward higher-quality care or adherence to staffing and safety standards.
  • Rate Structure: Possible guidance on tiered or differentiated rates based on factors such as age of children served, geographic cost variations, or quality ratings.
  • Transparency and Oversight: Could call for more transparent rate schedules and accountability measures for rate determinations.
  • Data and Reporting: May require a report or study by a specified deadline detailing recommended rate changes and fiscal implications.

Note: The exact substantive provisions depend on the text of the resolution. Joint resolutions in this context often function to promote policy directions or require agencies to pursue certain actions, rather than to enact permanent statutory changes.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Child Care Providers: Individuals and facilities receiving Purchase of Care reimbursements would be directly affected by any changes to rate structures or payment practices.
  • Families/Children: Families relying on Purchase of Care subsidies could experience improved access to care if rates better cover provider costs and encourage participation.
  • State Agencies: Agencies administering the Purchase of Care program (e.g., Department of Education, Department of Health and Social Services) may be directed to study, report, or implement rate-related changes.
  • Taxpayers/State Budget: Depending on rate adjustments, there could be fiscal implications requiring consideration in future budgets.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and Referral: Introduced on 2026-04-14 and assigned to the Health & Human Development Committee in the House.
  • Subsequent Actions: As a Joint Resolution, potential outcomes include committee hearings, floor consideration, and final passage by both chambers, followed by gubernatorial action if applicable (depending on the resolution’s scope). Since Joint Resolutions do not always impose lasting statutory changes, they may instead authorize study, guidance, or interim policy steps.

Practical Takeaways

  • The bill signals legislative interest in improving the reimbursement framework for Purchase of Care providers.
  • If enacted as a resolution with study directives or policy guidance, expect a committee-driven process to examine cost adequacy, access, and quality considerations before any formal rate changes.
  • Stakeholders (providers, families, and program administrators) should monitor for upcoming reports, hearings, or directives that detail recommended rate adjustments or methodologies.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to focus on a particular stakeholder group (providers, families, or policymakers) or incorporate any official fiscal notes or intended timelines once the full text becomes available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.