WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 4087

Publicly funded state and local institutions required to provide notice to United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement when certain noncitizens are being housed in a facility under the institution's control.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Keith Allen and 16 co-sponsors

Minnesota bill requires public institutions to notify ICE when housing noncitizens, creating local-federal immigration enforcement coordination with community trust implications.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Public Safety Finance and Policy
#governmentaloperations-federal #publicsafetydepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 4087

Legislative bill overview

HF 4087 requires publicly funded state and local institutions (such as jails, prisons, and detention facilities) to notify U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) when they are housing noncitizens meeting certain criteria. The bill mandates these notifications occur while individuals remain in institutional custody, creating a direct communication pipeline between Minnesota's public facilities and federal immigration enforcement.

Why is this important

This bill directly affects how state and local law enforcement interact with federal immigration authorities, potentially impacting thousands of noncitizens in Minnesota's custody. It raises questions about the relationship between local public safety institutions and federal immigration enforcement, with implications for community trust in local law enforcement, due process protections, and the resources required to implement such notification systems.

Potential points of contention

  • Local control vs. federal enforcement: Whether state/local institutions should be obligated to assist federal immigration enforcement or maintain separation between local public safety and federal immigration operations
  • Community trust and cooperation: Concerns that mandatory ICE notification could discourage immigrant communities from reporting crimes, seeking services, or cooperating with local law enforcement
  • Definition of "certain noncitizens": The bill's reference to undefined criteria for which noncitizens trigger notification requirements lacks clarity on scope and potential for over-inclusion
  • Resource and liability implications: Administrative burden and potential legal liability if institutions fail to notify or if notifications lead to due process violations
  • Conflicting sanctuary/public safety positions: Disagreement between those prioritizing immigration enforcement and those opposing local participation in federal immigration operations

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.