WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 582

Public high schools; each school board to employ at least one career coach.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Nadarius Clark and 7 co-sponsors

Rebalances funding to prioritize multimodal, regional transportation (transit, bicycles, pedestrians) over highway-only projects, with explicit scoring, local input, and caps on la

Left in Appropriations
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 582

HB 582 — "Transportation for the Future Act" — Summary

Purpose and intent
- Modernize how the State prioritizes and spends transportation dollars to support safer, more sustainable, and multimodal transportation systems (bicycles, sidewalks, transit, rail, freight and roads).
- Shift emphasis away from highway-only investments to give more funding and formal priority to public transit, bicycle/pedestrian projects, and multimodal regional investments.

Key provisions and changes
- Revised definitions (amends G.S. 136‑189.10)
- Expands and clarifies categories of eligible projects: Division Needs, Regional Impact, and Statewide Strategic Mobility projects to explicitly include bus rapid transit, commuter/intercity/light rail, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, and rail lines that span counties.
- Limits how much State funding can be used for major transit projects: State funding for commuter rail or light rail cannot exceed the lesser of (a) 10% of a distribution region’s allocation or (b) 10% of the estimated total project cost used in prioritization. Agreements must state these limits and the State is not liable for cost overruns beyond the cap.

  • Changes to the Transportation Investment Strategy Formula (amends G.S. 136‑189.11)

    • At least 20% of formula funds must be distributed to non‑highway (multimodal) projects.
    • Reallocates formula shares: Statewide Strategic Mobility projects reduced (from 40% to 30% of formula funds) while Regional Impact projects increased (from 30% to 40%). (Exact allocations appear in the bill text.)
    • Regional Impact funds are allocated to distribution regions by population (OSBM estimates).
    • Projects are to be ranked using quantitative transportation criteria on a 100‑point scale (examples: benefit‑cost, congestion, safety, economic competitiveness, freight, multimodal value, pavement condition, accessibility/connectivity, vehicle miles traveled, environmental quality) combined with local input for Regional Impact projects (local input weighted, public comment required).

  • Exclusions and procedural safeguards

    • Identifies numerous fund sources not subject to the formula (certain federal programs, toll revenue, GARVEE payments, State Ports appropriations, etc.).
    • Requires clear scoring, ranking, and feedback to applicants; directs the Department to develop numeric criteria and procedures for local input and public comment.
    • Places caps and non‑liability language around State commitments for large transit projects.

Who or what would be affected
- North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) — planning, scoring, prioritization, and project agreements.
- Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), Rural Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs), and Division Engineers — increased role in local input and scoring.
- Counties, municipalities, transit agencies, rail operators, bicycle/pedestrian project sponsors — new eligibility clarifications and funding opportunities, but funding caps for large rail projects.
- Communities and road users — potential increase in bicycle, pedestrian, and transit investments; possible tradeoffs in highway funding.
- Taxpayers — reallocation of formula funds; State exposure limited for cost overruns on some projects (explicit non‑liability language).

Procedural/timeline aspects
- The bill amends G.S. 136‑189.10 and G.S. 136‑189.11 (the Transportation Investment Strategy / prioritization and formula statutes).
- It establishes scoring, public input, and documentation requirements for project selection and requires that programmed funding respects the new caps and set‑asides (non‑highway minimum).
- Implementation will require NCDOT rulemaking/process updates, revised prioritization materials, and coordination with MPOs/RTPOs and local governments.

Net effect (practical)
- Rebalances the State’s transportation formula to increase regional and multimodal investment, institute explicit selection criteria and local input in prioritization, and constrain State financial exposure for large rail projects. The bill aims to make funding decisions more multimodal and regionally sensitive while preserving safeguards on State commitments for high‑cost transit projects.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.