WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 149

Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; regional airport authorities; include in the publicly funded health insurance contribution act. Amends sec. 2 of 2011 PA 152 (MCL 15.562).

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by John Damoose and 3 co-sponsors

Expands Michigan's public health insurance contribution law to require regional airport authorities to contribute to employee health insurance costs like other public employers.

REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND CONSUMER PROTECTION
#aeronautics:airportauthority #publicemployeesandofficers:compensationandbenefits
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 149

Legislative bill overview

SB 149 would expand Michigan's Publicly Funded Health Insurance Contribution Act (2011 PA 152) to include regional airport authorities as covered entities required to contribute to employees' health insurance costs. Currently, the law applies to various public employers but excludes airport authorities, creating a gap in health insurance contribution requirements for airport workers.

Why is this important

This change directly affects how regional airports fund employee health insurance—either requiring them to increase contributions or potentially shifting costs to employees. It also addresses equity concerns by bringing airport authority employees under the same health insurance contribution standards as other public sector workers, while potentially increasing operational costs for regional airports across Michigan.

Potential points of contention

  • Fiscal impact on airports: Regional airports may argue increased health insurance contribution mandates will strain already-limited budgets, potentially affecting service quality, staffing, or other operations
  • Scope of coverage: Disagreement may arise over which airport authorities qualify (regional vs. all), and whether private airport operators or only public ones should be included
  • Competitive disadvantage: Some airports could face disadvantages competing with non-unionized or private aviation facilities if forced to increase benefits packages relative to regional competitors

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.