WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 475

Provides for the recall power of the electors to remove an elective officer

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Jim Tedisco

Expands Medicare Part D to cover qualifying non-opioid pain drugs with no deductible, lowest-cost tier, and no step therapy or prior authorization, starting 2026.

OPINION REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 475

Note on documents provided
- The materials supplied appear to include text from two different bills that share the number “S. 475” but are from different jurisdictions, plus a separate (unrelated) title at the top (“Provides for the recall power…”). I have summarized the two identifiable bills below and flagged the inconsistent metadata. If you want only one of these (federal or Massachusetts) or the recall-power text, tell me which and I’ll produce a focused summary.

Federal bill — “Alternatives to PAIN Act” (S. 475, introduced Feb 6, 2025)
Purpose
- Amend Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand access to certain FDA‑approved non‑opioid pain management drugs under Medicare Part D by reducing beneficiary cost‑sharing and prohibiting some utilization controls.

Key provisions
- Effective date: plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2026.
- Definition: “Qualifying non‑opioid pain management drug” = a drug/biologic that:
- has an FDA label indication to reduce postoperative or other acute pain;
- does not act on opioid receptors;
- has no therapeutically equivalent drug marketed in the U.S.; and
- has a wholesale acquisition cost for a monthly supply that does not exceed the monthly specialty‑tier cost threshold (as determined by the Secretary).
- Cost‑sharing changes (Amend §1860D–2):
- Deductible under Part D shall not apply to qualifying drugs.
- Qualifying drugs must be placed on the lowest cost‑sharing tier, for purposes of maximum coinsurance/other cost‑sharing.
- Low‑income subsidy (Amend §1860D–14):
- Conforming rules: low‑income beneficiaries receive coverage consistent with §1860D–2(b)(10) (i.e., deductible exemption and lowest tier placement).
- Utilization management (Amend §1860D–4(c)):
- For qualifying drugs, Part D plans and MA‑PD plans may not impose:
- Step‑therapy requirements that force use of an opioid before the non‑opioid; or
- Prior authorization requirements.
- Defines “step therapy” and “prior authorization” for this context.

Who is affected / likely impacts
- Medicare Part D enrollees with acute/postoperative pain: reduced out‑of‑pocket costs and fewer administrative barriers to certain non‑opioid options.
- Low‑income subsidy recipients: same protections apply.
- Part D sponsors and MA‑PD plans: must adjust formularies, tier placement, and utilization management policies for qualifying products.
- Drug manufacturers: incentives for non‑opioid acute pain products that meet the qualifying criteria; potential market access improvements for eligible products.
- Fiscal implications: greater utilization of qualifying drugs may increase Part D costs; the bill limits qualifying products by cost threshold and therapeutic uniqueness.

Procedural status (from provided federal text)
- Introduced in U.S. Senate Feb 6, 2025 (sponsors include TILLIS as primary and many bipartisan cosponsors).
- Referred to Senate Committee on Finance.
- Companion/related federal measures listed (e.g., H.R. 1227).

Massachusetts bill — “An Act promoting housing stability for older adults across the commonwealth” (Senate No. 475, filed Jan 16, 2025)
Purpose
- Expand and institutionalize a short‑term “housing bridge” pilot for older adults (age 60+) to prevent eviction and homelessness while they secure permanent affordable housing.

Key provisions
- Steering committee (Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities to convene):
- Chair: Secretary (or designee).
- Members include representatives from Executive Office of Elder Affairs, Massachusetts Coalition for the Homeless, participating Aging Services Access Points, Home Care Alliance, 3 older adults with lived experience (appointed by Coalition), legislative committee chairs, and additional legislative appointees.
- Responsibilities: manage/guide expansion, develop recommendations, file annual reports by Dec 31 to Governor and relevant committees, and publish reports online.
- Pilot eligibility (expanded):
- Households including an individual age 60+ who live in the Commonwealth;
- Income ≤ 80% of area median income;
- At risk of eviction due to inability to consistently pay rent.
- Participating households must not be required to pay more than 30% of monthly adjusted income for housing costs while receiving assistance.
- Program operations:
- Executive office may enter performance‑based contracts with older‑adult serving agencies to establish/expand short‑term housing bridge subsidies across urban, suburban, and rural areas.
- Funding: subject to appropriation or third‑party reimbursement.
- Reporting: annual reports with recommendations for statewide implementation.

Who is affected / likely impacts
- Older adults (60+) at risk of eviction: temporary financial/housing assistance, caps on housing cost burden during assistance, improved pathways to permanent affordable housing.
- Service providers and Aging Services Access Points: potential contracts to administer subsidies.
- State budget: new program expansion contingent on appropriations/third‑party funds.

Procedural status (from provided Massachusetts text)
- Filed as Senate Docket No. 1357 / Senate No. 475 on 1/16/2025 by Sen. Patricia Jehlen (and others).
- Referred to relevant committees (Elder Affairs, Aging and Independence); hearings and committee referrals and subsequent actions listed in the material (dates include hearings and committee reports). Several entries in your ledger (e.g., “OPINION REFERRED TO JUDICIARY,” “House concurred”) appear to track state‑level committee/action steps.

Conflicting/inaccurate metadata in supplied package
- The top metadata (“Bill Number: S 475 — Provides for the recall power of the electors…”) does not match the federal or Massachusetts bill texts provided. No recall‑power provisions were present in the texts.
- Two different bills (federal Medicare Part D changes and a Massachusetts housing bill) share “S. 475” in the supplied materials. The sponsors lists and legislative actions appear to mix federal Senate sponsors and Massachusetts docket activity. If you want a corrected, single‑jurisdiction summary (or citation checks), tell me which bill to focus on and I will produce a cleaned, jurisdiction‑specific brief with citations and next steps.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.