WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 1388

SB 1388 - This act provides for the county prosecuting attorney system to be converted to a circuit court district attorney system. District attorneys shall be first elected for terms of four years during the 2028 general election in each judicial circuit for counties that elect to be part of the system. In the 2032 general election, district attorneys shall be elected for each judicial circuit. The district attorney shall be a resident of the judicial circuit for one year before being elected and shall receive the same annual salary as the circuit judge. District attorneys shall be included in the Prosecuting Attorneys and Circuit Attorneys' Retirement System and shall be treated as prosecuting attorneys for such purposes. District attorneys shall prosecute all criminal actions for the counties. If a change of venue is granted, the district attorney shall continue to prosecute the case in the other venue. If a district attorney is unable to prosecute because of a conflict of interest, the presiding judge shall appoint another district attorney from an adjoining circuit to serve on that particular matter. The district attorneys may appoint assistants, investigators, and clerical staff, and may set their salaries within the limits set by the county commissions. Such salaries shall be paid by the counties and the salary of the district attorney shall be paid by the state, except if a charter county chooses to provide the district attorney with additional compensation over the statutory amount, the county shall pay such amount. The salaries, excluding that of the district attorney, and expenses of the district attorney offices shall be funded by the respective counties. However, the state shall provide increasing reimbursement of the costs over the course of several years. This act contains the schedule for reimbursement by the state to the counties, ranging from 5 or 10 percent in the first year of implementation of a district attorney and up to 50 percent in the fifth or tenth year depending on the circuit court. In circuits where more than one county contributes to the expenses, each county shall be reimbursed in the same proportion as the contribution. This act requires the district attorney to be employed full-time and not practice law elsewhere. For counties without a charter form of government, the county commissions shall adopt, by majority vote, a resolution, which shall be given to the Secretary of State at least by November 7, 2027. For counties with a charter form of government, the governing body shall adopt a charter amendment to join the system and eliminate the office of prosecuting attorney. The office of the county prosecuting attorney shall cease to exist upon the election and qualification of a district attorney for such county and circuit. However, county prosecuting attorneys may be retained by the district attorney. This act is substantially similar to SB 742 (2025) and is similar to SB 79 (2015), SB 797 (2010), and SB 1256 (2004). TRISTAN BENSON, JR.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Nick Schroer

Missouri bill converts county-based prosecution system to circuit court district attorney model, consolidating local prosecutorial authority into regional jurisdictions.

Second Read and Referred S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1388

Legislative bill overview

SB 1388 would restructure Missouri's prosecutorial system by replacing the current county-based prosecuting attorney model with a circuit court district attorney system. This represents a fundamental reorganization of how criminal prosecution is managed at the local level, aligning prosecutorial jurisdictions with judicial circuit boundaries rather than county lines.

Why is this important

This change would affect how criminal cases are prosecuted across Missouri counties, potentially impacting resource allocation, case handling efficiency, and prosecutorial consistency. The shift could consolidate smaller county prosecutor offices and create larger district-based units, which could have significant implications for rural counties, prosecution standards, and access to justice in different regions.

Potential points of contention

  • Rural county representation and resources: Smaller counties may lose dedicated prosecutorial authority and resources, potentially weakening prosecution capacity in less populous areas
  • Implementation costs and logistics: Converting the entire system requires substantial funding for restructuring, staff reorganization, and potential office relocations across multiple counties
  • Local control concerns: Counties would cede direct control over prosecution to circuit-level authority, raising questions about responsiveness to local community priorities and crime patterns
  • Workforce displacement and morale: Existing county prosecutors and staff could face job uncertainty, reassignment, or elimination, potentially causing institutional disruption

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.