WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 4240

Provides for recovery of economic development awards in cases where the recipient relocates outside the state

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Kevin Parker

Claws back New Jersey economic development awards if a recipient relocates operations out of New Jersey, ensuring incentives are not kept by relocating firms.

REFERRED TO COMMERCE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SMALL BUSINESS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 4240

Summary of Senate Bill S 4240 (New Jersey)

Overview

  • Bill number: S 4240
  • Title/purpose (as stated): Provides for recovery (clawback) of economic development awards in cases where the recipient relocates outside the state.
  • Sponsor: Kevin S. Parker (primary)
  • Status: Referred to the Commerce, Economic Development and Small Business Committee
  • Introduced: March 3, 2025
  • Related/companion bills: A 3315 (companion); related bills in prior sessions include S 555, S 952, S 1893, S 3307, S 3479, S 3628, S 4612, S 5021, S 6198
  • Note on content discrepancy: The version text labeled “Introduced Version” appears to describe a different subject (school districts under state intervention) rather than economic development award clawback. Readers should consult the official bill text for S 4240 to confirm the exact provisions.

Purpose and Intent

  • The core aim, as described in the bill’s title, is to authorize the recovery or “clawback” of economic development awards when the recipient relocates its operations out of New Jersey. The bill is intended to prevent state-supported incentives from being diverted to businesses that relocate outside the state.

Key Provisions (as described by bill title and typical clawback framework)

Note: The exact statutory language should be reviewed in the enrolled bill for precise definitions and procedures. The following outlines common elements typically found in clawback provisions for economic development awards:
- Definitions:
- Clarify which forms of economic development awards are covered (grants, tax credits, loans, incentives, reimbursements, etc.).
- Define “relocates” (e.g., relocation of primary operations, headquarters, or substantial business activity) and the measurement period.
- Triggers for clawback:
- Relocation outside the state within a specified period after receiving the award.
- Failure to meet performance or job-creation/retention requirements tied to the award.
- Recovery mechanics:
- Proportional or full repayment of awarded funds or a reduction/recapture of tax incentives.
- Interest or penalties for noncompliance, if applicable.
- Procedures for determining the amount and method of repayment.
- Oversight and enforcement:
- Which state agency administers the clawback (likely the Department of Commerce, Division of Taxation, or related authorities) and enforcement mechanisms.
- Compliance reporting requirements for award recipients.
- Exceptions and adjustments:
- Possible waivers, negotiations, or reduced recoveries in cases of unforeseen circumstances or force majeure.
- Transitional provisions for existing awards.
- Appeals and disputes:
- Process for challenging clawback determinations or repayment calculations.

Affected Parties

  • Primary: Recipients of economic development awards (companies, developers, or other entities) that received state-backed incentives.
  • Secondary: State government agencies administering incentives, local governments/agencies involved in the awards, and potentially workers affected by project outcomes.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction date: March 3, 2025
  • Current stage: Referred to the Commerce, Economic Development and Small Business Committee (as of the introduced date)
  • Next steps in the legislative process: Committee consideration, potential amendments, passage by both houses, and potential gubernatorial action. If advanced, accompanying fiscal analyses or impact statements may be produced.

Observations and Practical Considerations

  • Fiscal impact: Clawback provisions can affect the net cost/benefit of awards and may improve public cost-effectiveness by ensuring recipients remain in-state.
  • Compliance burden: Award recipients may face additional reporting and certification requirements to demonstrate ongoing compliance with award conditions.
  • Policy rationale: S 4240 aligns with efforts to safeguard public resources and ensure incentives subsidize activities retained within New Jersey.

Recommendation

To provide a precise and authoritative summary, review the official text of S 4240 and any fiscal notes or committee statements. The current introduced content supplied here contains a notable mismatch with the stated bill focus, so the exact provisions (definitions, clawback computations, remedies, and timelines) should be verified in the enrolled bill.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.