WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 1645

Provides for priority status to victims of human trafficking for the receipt of certain assistance

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Cordell Cleare and 2 co-sponsors

The bill authorizes the Suffolk County Sheriff to establish and operate a county regional lockup for pre-arraignment detainees, with appointed administrator and cross-jurisdictiona

COMMITTED TO RULES
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 1645

Note on source materials
The bill metadata you provided includes a title about prioritizing human‑trafficking victims for assistance, but the bill text attached is a Massachusetts state bill (S.1645) entitled “An Act to codify the Suffolk County Sheriff’s authority to provide pre‑arraignment care of arrestees.” This summary describes the provisions contained in the bill text actually provided.

Summary — S.1645 (2025): Codifying Suffolk County Sheriff authority for pre‑arraignment care and establishing a county regional lockup

Main purpose and intent

The bill clarifies and expands statutory authority for the Suffolk County Sheriff to operate a county regional lockup (pre‑arraignment detention facility), to appoint and remove the facility administrator, and to exercise related custody, transport, and detention duties for persons arrested prior to arraignment. It also specifies administrative, jurisdictional, and liability provisions for the sheriff and member jurisdictions.

Key provisions (by section)

  • Amends G.L. c. 40, §34:
    • Confirms that towns (and regional lockups) may maintain secure lockups for persons arrested without a warrant; allows magistrates to commit certain prisoners to the lockup in the arresting town, a regional lockup of which the town is a member, or to the lockup in a town where the court is held if appropriate.
  • Amends G.L. c. 40, §35:
    • Grants the county sheriff responsibility to appoint the administrator of a county regional lockup; the sheriff sets the administrator’s term and may terminate the administrator with or without cause. Written notice of appointment/termination must be filed with county commissioners and member city/town clerks. The administrator has the powers/duties of a keeper of the lockup.
  • Amends G.L. c. 40, §36B:
    • Inserts “regional” and “county sheriff” into statutory language to reflect regional lockup and sheriff involvement.
  • New § (Section 5):
    • Authorizes the Suffolk County Sheriff to establish a county regional lockup at the county jail site or elsewhere in Suffolk County solely for detention of persons arrested on probable cause/warrant or under civil process.
    • Requires space for interviews and for clerks/magistrates to conduct bail hearings.
    • Permits cities/towns and state/federal law enforcement agencies to join the county regional lockup by written agreement with the sheriff; agreements filed with city/town clerks and Secretary of State and set forth transportation/booking details.
    • Member officers transporting prisoners to the regional lockup retain full police authority and jurisdiction during transport.
    • Provides that member municipalities are not required to comply with G.L. c. 40, §36C (training provision); however, training required by statute shall be completed within 1 year of the facility’s establishment.
    • Confers the regional lockup administrator and sheriff the same authority/jurisdiction/duties to detain, book, hold, and transport pre‑arraignment prisoners as under chapter 40.
  • Section 6:
    • Extends to the Suffolk County Sheriff the protections of G.L. c. 258, §9 (state officer liability protections) as though the sheriff held constitutional office.
  • Section 7:
    • Act takes effect upon passage.

Who is affected

  • Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office: gains authority to create and operate a county regional lockup, appoint an at‑will administrator, and perform detention/transport duties.
  • Member cities/towns and their police departments: may join the regional lockup system by agreement; member officers retain jurisdiction during transport; some statutory training requirements are deferred with a one‑year completion requirement for training after facility opening.
  • Arrestees: pre‑arraignment detainees in Suffolk County may be booked, held, and processed at a county regional lockup rather than municipal lockups.
  • Clerks/magistrates: designated space for bail hearings/interviews will be provided at the facility.
  • County commissioners and municipal clerks: receive notice of appointments/terminations.

Procedural / timeline aspects

  • Effective upon passage.
  • Legislative status (from provided actions): Introduced Jan 17, 2025; referred to Public Safety and Homeland Security committee; read twice and referred to Committee on Finance (May 7, 2025); committee hearings scheduled; listed as COMMITTED TO RULES (June 13, 2025). Several calendar and reading entries noted.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Centralizes pre‑arraignment detention and booking functions under the Suffolk County Sheriff, which could produce efficiencies in booking, access to magistrates, and standardized procedures.
  • Shifts operational control from some municipalities to the county sheriff, raising local governance and cost‑sharing considerations to be addressed in membership agreements.
  • The sheriff’s authority to appoint/terminate the administrator at will raises questions about oversight and labor/employment practices.
  • Grants of immunity (c. 258, §9) may affect civil liability exposure.
  • One‑year timeframe for required training suggests an implementation period for compliance.

Sponsors and related bills (as provided)

  • Sponsors listed in the submission include a mix of names (Chris Van Hollen, Jerry Moran, Tammy Baldwin, others) and additional related/companion bill numbers were provided; these entries appear inconsistent with a Massachusetts state bill and may reflect data mismatches in the source materials.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.