WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 1421

"Protecting Against Forever Chemicals Act"; establishes requirements, prohibitions, and programs for regulation of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

2024-2025 Regular Session Introduced by Clinton Calabrese and 8 co-sponsors

New Jersey bill establishes PFAS regulations and restrictions to reduce environmental and drinking water contamination from persistent synthetic chemicals.

Introduced in the Assembly, Referred to Assembly Environment, Natural Resources, and Solid Waste Committee
#hazsubstanc #watersupply
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 1421

Legislative bill overview

Bill A 1421 proposes comprehensive state-level regulation of PFAS (forever chemicals), which are persistent synthetic compounds used in numerous consumer and industrial products that don't break down in the environment or human body. The bill would establish requirements, prohibitions, and regulatory programs to limit PFAS use and manage their presence in New Jersey's environment and water supplies.

Why is this important

PFAS contamination has been detected in drinking water supplies across New Jersey and nationally, with emerging health concerns including links to immune suppression, thyroid disease, and increased cholesterol. State-level action addresses a gap in federal regulation, as the EPA has only recently begun setting drinking water standards, and comprehensive national PFAS legislation remains stalled in Congress.

Potential points of contention

  • Industry compliance costs: Manufacturers, water utilities, and waste management facilities may face significant expenses to reformulate products, upgrade treatment systems, or modify operations to comply with new PFAS restrictions.
  • Economic impact on certain sectors: Industries reliant on PFAS (including firefighting foam manufacturers, non-stick cookware producers, and waterproof textile makers) could face reduced market access or relocation if restrictions are stringent.
  • Scope and feasibility questions: PFAS are in thousands of products; critics may argue the bill's requirements are either too broad (creating unintended economic consequences) or too narrow (failing to address primary contamination sources).

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.