WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 431

Protect Whistleblower LEOs from Retaliation.

2025-2026 Session Introduced by Val Applewhite and 9 co-sponsors

The bill requires on‑duty officers to intervene when safe and to report suspected misconduct within 72 hours, with protections against retaliation for the reporter.

Passed 1st Reading
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 431

SB 431 — "Protect Whistleblower LEOs from Retaliation" — Summary

Purpose
- Establish statutory duties for law enforcement and other criminal-justice personnel to intervene (when safe and reasonably possible) and to report observed excessive or unlawful conduct, and to protect those who make such reports from retaliation.
- Provide limited state funding for training about the new duties and protections.

Key provisions
- Amend G.S. 15A‑401 (arrest/use of force statute):
- Adds a duty for an on‑duty officer who observes another officer using force that the observer reasonably believes exceeds authorized force to, if safe and feasible, attempt to intervene.
- Requires the observing officer to report the suspected unauthorized use of force within a “reasonable period of time not to exceed 72 hours” to a superior in the officer’s agency. If the agency head was involved or present, the report must be made to the highest ranking officer not involved or present.
- Making a knowingly false report under this subsection is a Class 2 misdemeanor.
- Provides that an officer who makes such a report “shall not be terminated, disciplined, or otherwise retaliated against” for making the report, but agencies may still discipline for conduct that occurred prior to the report.

  • New statutes added to:
    • Article 1 of Chapter 17C — § 17C‑17 (criminal justice officers)
    • Article 2 of Chapter 17E — § 17E‑17 (justice officers)
    • These parallel provisions require on‑duty officers who observe (and have a reasonable opportunity to intervene) the following types of misconduct to, if safe, attempt to intervene and to report within 72 hours:
    • Violations of federal, State, city, or county laws, ordinances, or regulations;
    • Fraud;
    • Misappropriation of public resources;
    • Activity posing a substantial danger to public health or safety;
    • Gross mismanagement (including gross waste of public monies or gross abuse of authority).
    • Reports follow the same escalation rule if the immediate supervisor/department head is involved or present.
    • Officers who make such reports are protected from termination, discipline, or other retaliation for reporting; false reports are a Class 2 misdemeanor. Agencies may still take disciplinary action for prior misconduct.

Who is affected
- On‑duty law enforcement officers, criminal justice officers, and justice officers employed by State, county, and local agencies across North Carolina.
- Agency supervisors and internal affairs/disciplinary structures who must receive and process reports.
- The Criminal Justice Education and Training Standards Commission and the Sheriffs’ Education and Training Standards Commission (for training implementation).

Fiscal and implementation details
- One‑time appropriations: $50,000 (nonrecurring) from the General Fund to the Department of Justice to allocate to the Criminal Justice Education and Training Standards Commission, and $50,000 (nonrecurring) to allocate to the Sheriffs’ Education and Training Standards Commission — total $100,000 for training on the statutory changes (FY 2025‑26).
- Training funds are intended to inform officers about the new intervention/reporting duties and whistleblower protections.

Penalties and limits
- Knowingly false reports: Class 2 misdemeanor.
- Protections do not bar legitimate disciplinary action for misconduct occurring prior to making a report.

Timing / effective date
- The act becomes effective December 1, 2025.
- It applies to offenses committed and retaliatory actions taken on or after that date.

Practical considerations
- Agencies will need procedures for receiving/escalating reports, protecting reporting officers, and investigating allegations while preserving due process.
- Training and internal policy updates will be necessary to implement the 72‑hour reporting deadline, escalation routes, documentation, and anti‑retaliation safeguards.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.