WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 298

PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE III, SECTION 4, OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF HAWAII TO ESTABLISH TERM LIMITS FOR LEGISLATORS.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by David Alcos and 6 co-sponsors

HB 298 proposes constitutional amendment establishing consecutive term limits for Hawaii legislators, requiring voter referendum approval to implement generational turnover in state legislature.

Carried over to 2026 Regular Session.
#constitutionalamendment #minoritycaucuspackage(conam) #termlimits
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 298

Legislative bill overview

HB 298 proposes a constitutional amendment to limit the number of consecutive terms Hawaii state legislators can serve. The bill would require voters to approve the amendment through a referendum before it could take effect. This is a structural change to Hawaii's legislative branch that would reshape long-term representation in the state.

Why is this important

Term limits directly affect legislative power dynamics, incumbent advantage, and voter choice. They could increase legislative turnover and fresh perspectives, but may also reduce institutional expertise and increase lobbyist influence over less-experienced lawmakers. The amendment requires constitutional approval, making it a significant governance matter affecting all future state legislators.

Potential points of contention

  • Defining "consecutive terms": Ambiguity about whether limits reset after time away, or if non-consecutive service counts toward total career limits
  • Competitive disadvantage for incumbents: Sitting legislators may face opposition from those wanting change, though this also raises questions about voter preference for experienced representatives
  • Lobbyist leverage: Inexperienced legislators might rely more heavily on lobbyists and staff for policy guidance, potentially shifting influence away from elected representatives
  • Voter choice restriction: Term limits prevent voters from re-electing preferred candidates indefinitely, raising democratic choice concerns
  • Specific limit number unknown: The bill details aren't provided, so the actual term limit (e.g., 8 years, 12 years) remains unclear and significantly impacts the amendment's effects

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.