WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 2380

PROPOSING AMENDMENTS TO THE HAWAII STATE CONSTITUTION TO ESTABLISH A CONTINUOUS LEGISLATIVE SESSION.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Stanley Chang

Hawaii constitutional amendment to replace fixed 60-day legislative sessions with year-round continuous sessions, increasing legislative flexibility but raising concerns about costs and public participation.

The committee(s) on JDC recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, UNAMENDED. The votes in JDC were as follows: 3 Aye(s): Senator(s) Rhoads, Gabbard, Chang; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 2 No(es): Senator(s) San Buenaventura, Awa; and 0 Excused: none.
#constitutionalamendment #constitutionalrepeal #continuouslegislativesession
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2380

Legislative bill overview

SB 2380 proposes amending the Hawaii State Constitution to establish a continuous legislative session, replacing Hawaii's current system of regular, fixed-length legislative sessions. This constitutional amendment would fundamentally alter how the state legislature operates and conducts business throughout the year.

Why is this important

Hawaii currently operates under a constitutional framework limiting the legislature to 60-day regular sessions, which can restrict lawmakers' ability to respond to emerging issues or conduct thorough deliberation on complex matters. Shifting to continuous sessions could improve legislative responsiveness and allow for more flexible scheduling, though it would also significantly increase the demands on legislators, staff, and the public's ability to track legislative activity.

Potential points of contention

  • Increased legislative workload and costs: Continuous sessions would require year-round operations, potentially increasing state spending on legislative staff, facilities, and administration, raising questions about fiscal impact
  • Reduced public engagement: Continuous sessions spanning the entire year may make it harder for constituents and advocacy groups to effectively track and participate in the legislative process compared to a defined 60-day window
  • Legislative overreach concerns: Some may argue unlimited session time could lead to more bills being passed and less thoughtful deliberation, while others contend it enables better legislative scrutiny and prevents rushed decision-making at session's end

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.