WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HJR 59

Proposing a constitutional amendment to authorize a political subdivision other than a school district to establish a limitation on the amount of ad valorem taxes that the political subdivision may impose on the residence homesteads of persons who are disabled or elderly and their surviving spouses.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by John Bucy

Texas constitutional amendment would let cities and counties voluntarily cap property taxes on elderly and disabled homeowners' primary residences, subject to local voter approval.

Referred to Ways & Means
#aging(i0015) #disabilities #personswith(i0380) #politicalsubdivisions(i0588) #propertyinterests--homestead(i0616) #resolutions--constitutionalamendments(i0661) #taxation--property-assessment&collection(i0798) #taxation--property-exemptions(i0793)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HJR 59

Legislative bill overview

HJR 59 proposes a constitutional amendment allowing Texas political subdivisions (cities, counties, etc.—excluding school districts) to voluntarily cap property tax rates on homesteads owned by elderly or disabled persons and their surviving spouses. Currently, only school districts have this constitutional authority. The amendment would require voter approval both in the legislature and at the ballot.

Why is this important

Property taxes on fixed incomes create genuine hardship for elderly and disabled homeowners. This amendment could provide tax relief at the local level, though its actual impact depends entirely on whether individual municipalities choose to adopt caps. It represents a potential tool for affordability but does not mandate relief.

Potential points of contention

  • Revenue impact: Cities and counties relying on property tax revenue may resist caps that reduce funding for services like police, fire, and infrastructure maintenance
  • Means-testing complexity: Determining who qualifies as "disabled" requires clear definitions and administrative oversight; implementation costs could offset savings
  • Equity concerns: Providing tax breaks based on age or disability status while other low-income residents pay full rates raises fairness questions about who deserves relief
  • Local control variation: Creates a patchwork where some jurisdictions offer caps while neighboring ones don't, potentially influencing property values and municipal competitiveness

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.