WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HJR 37

Proposing a constitutional amendment relating to the determination of a quorum of the senate or house of representatives.

89th Legislature, 1st Called Session (2025) Introduced by Richard Hayes

Texas constitutional amendment proposal would reduce quorum requirements for Senate and House by allowing votes based on attending members rather than fixed percentages of all elected legislators.

Filed
#legislature(i0520) #resolutions--constitutionalamendments(i0661)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HJR 37

Legislative bill overview

HJR 37 proposes a constitutional amendment that would change how a quorum (minimum attendance required for legislative business) is determined in the Texas Senate or House of Representatives. Rather than requiring a fixed percentage of all elected members to be physically present, the amendment would allow the determination of quorum based on members actually present and voting, potentially enabling legislative action with fewer members in attendance.

Why is this important

Quorum requirements are foundational to democratic legislating—they ensure that a minimum threshold of elected representatives participate in major decisions. Changing this rule could substantially alter how Texas conducts business, potentially allowing smaller groups of lawmakers to pass legislation with less public scrutiny and reduced deliberative oversight. Constitutional amendments also require voter approval, making this a decision that extends beyond the Legislature itself.

Potential points of contention

  • Democratic participation: Critics argue that looser quorum rules reduce the voices heard in legislative decisions and concentrate power among fewer members who choose to participate
  • Legislative efficiency vs. accountability: Supporters may claim fewer quorum requirements speed up lawmaking, while opponents contend this sacrifices transparency and thorough debate
  • Vagueness of "voting members": The mechanism for determining which members count toward a quorum under this amendment could create procedural disputes and ambiguity in what constitutes valid legislative action

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.