WeVote

Bill

Bill

SJR 51

Proposing a constitutional amendment protecting children by allowing for retroactive laws regarding civil causes of action arising out of child sexual abuse.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Angela Paxton

Texas constitutional amendment would allow retroactive civil lawsuits for child sexual abuse, removing statute of limitations barriers for survivors seeking damages.

Referred to State Affairs
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SJR 51

Legislative bill overview

SJR 51 proposes a Texas constitutional amendment that would allow the state legislature to pass retroactive laws extending the statute of limitations for civil lawsuits involving child sexual abuse. This would enable survivors to sue for damages even after the normal time period to file such claims has expired, overriding the existing legal principle that laws generally cannot be applied retroactively.

Why is this important

Child sexual abuse survivors often delay reporting due to trauma, shame, or psychological barriers, meaning they may discover abuse years or decades later. This amendment would remove time barriers that currently prevent survivors from seeking civil remedies and holding perpetrators or negligent institutions financially accountable. It directly affects survivors' legal rights, institutional liability exposure, and the statute of limitations framework in Texas law.

Potential points of contention

  • Due process concerns: Opponents may argue that retroactive laws violate principles of fair notice and due process by holding defendants liable for conduct under rules that didn't exist when the actions occurred
  • Institutional liability: Organizations like schools, churches, and youth groups could face significant financial exposure from decades-old claims, raising questions about fairness to current leadership for past employees' actions
  • Evidentiary challenges: Retroactive cases rely on older evidence and witness testimony, potentially compromising defendants' ability to mount an adequate legal defense after substantial time has passed

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.