WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HJR 84

Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to set a minimum amount of monetary bond for persons charged with certain felony offenses involving violence and requiring the denial of bail to a person accused of committing a felony while released on bail for a prior felony under most circumstances.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Charles Cunningham

Texas constitutional amendment authorizing legislature to set minimum bonds for violent felonies and mandate bail denial for those accused of crimes while on bail for prior felonies.

Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
#courts--judges(i0140) #crimes--againstpersons--general(i0170) #crimes--againstpersons--sexual(i0171) #criminalprocedure--bail&pretrialrelease(i0202) #resolutions--constitutionalamendments(i0661)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HJR 84

Legislative bill overview

HJR 84 proposes a constitutional amendment to authorize the Texas legislature to establish minimum monetary bond amounts for felony violent offenses and to mandate bail denial for individuals accused of committing felonies while already released on bail for previous felonies. This would modify Texas's current constitutional provisions regarding bail eligibility and discretion.

Why is this important

Bail policy directly affects public safety, criminal justice system efficiency, and individual liberty. This amendment would shift power from judges to legislators regarding bail-setting standards and could increase pretrial detention rates, affecting case processing times, jail capacity, and defendants' presumption of innocence protections during the charging phase.

Potential points of contention

  • Judicial discretion vs. legislative mandates: Critics argue mandatory minimum bonds and bail denials remove judges' ability to consider individual circumstances (ties to community, employment, family status), potentially resulting in unjust detention of lower-risk defendants unable to afford set amounts
  • Pretrial detention concerns: Opponents worry mandatory bail denial could violate due process and increase jail populations significantly, with disparate impacts on low-income defendants who cannot afford bail while awaiting trial
  • Public safety balance: Supporters argue the measure protects communities by preventing repeat offenses during pretrial release, while critics question whether detention prevents crime versus simply delaying court proceedings for accused individuals not yet convicted

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.