Proposes a constitutional amendment that exempts buildings under construction from property taxation

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Don Mayhew

Proposes a constitutional amendment to curb the state's extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction, putting a voter-approved limit on prosecutions for acts outside the state.

Public Hearing Completed (H)

#constitutionalamendments #property #realandpersonal #taxationandrevenue-property

HJR 132 — Proposing a constitutional amendment limiting the extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction of this state

Overview

HJR 132 is a joint resolution that proposes a constitutional amendment to restrict the state’s extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction. In practical terms, the bill would change the state constitution to limit when the state can assert criminal authority over conduct that occurs outside its borders. The exact text and scope of the restriction are not provided in the summary, but the aim is to narrow the state's ability to prosecute or otherwise exercise criminal jurisdiction for acts committed outside state territory.

What the bill would do

Propose a constitutional amendment to limit extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction.

As a joint resolution, it would seek to place the amendment on the ballot for voter approval rather than implementing immediate statutory changes.

The amendment would define or carve out boundaries on when the state can exercise criminal jurisdiction for conduct occurring outside its borders, with specifics to be determined by the final constitutional language.

Key provisions (as available)

The bill’s primary stated purpose is to limit extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction; the exact statutory and constitutional text, including any definitions, thresholds, exceptions, or enforcement mechanisms, is not included in the information provided.

Being a constitutional amendment, if enacted, it would require promulgation steps typical of constitutional amendments in the state (e.g., legislative passage and voter ratification), though the precise procedural requirements are not detailed here.

Affected parties and potential impact

Residents and visitors: The scope of the state’s criminal reach beyond its borders could be narrowed, potentially affecting prosecutions for crimes committed outside the state by state residents or others.

Law enforcement and prosecutors: Policies, case planning, and multi-jurisdictional cooperation could shift as the state narrows its extraterritorial reach.

Defendants and victims in cross-border scenarios: The amendment could change available remedies, extradition considerations, and cooperation with other jurisdictions.

Interstate and international relations: Depending on the final text, there could be implications for cooperation with other states and countries in criminal matters.

Procedural and timeline aspects

Introduced: February 5, 2025

Filed: February 5, 2025

2025-03-19: Read first time

2025-03-19: Referred to State Affairs

Status: Referred to State Affairs

Next steps and considerations

If the legislature approves the amendment, it would typically be sent to voters for ratification in a statewide election (the exact process depends on state rules for constitutional amendments).

The absence of the bill’s full text means precise definitions, exceptions (e.g., where extraterritorial actions involve federal jurisdiction, cross-border crimes, or international treaties), and enforcement mechanisms are unknown.

Readers may wish to review the full bill text upon release to understand the precise limitations, any transitional provisions, and potential fiscal implications.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to a specific state’s legislative process or incorporate any available full-text language or committee analyses when they’re released.