WeVote
Log In

Bill

JA

Bill

HB 4606

Property: other; act regarding termination of tenancy by the entireties; revise gender-specific language. Amends sec. 1 of 1927 PA 210 (MCL 557.101). TIE BAR WITH: HJR F'25

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Joey Andrews and 27 co-sponsors

Michigan bill removes gender-specific language from 1927 property law governing joint tenancy ownership rights while preserving existing legal protections and frameworks.

bill electronically reproduced 06/10/2025
#civilrights:sexualorientationdiscrimination #property:other
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 4606

Legislative bill overview

HB 4606 amends Michigan's 1927 Property Act to modernize the language governing tenancy by the entireties—a form of joint property ownership traditionally used by married couples. The bill removes gender-specific language from the statute while maintaining the legal framework for how such properties are managed and transferred. This appears to be a technical/modernizing revision rather than a substantive change to property rights.

Why is this important

Tenancy by the entireties provides specific legal protections regarding property ownership and creditor claims, so accurate statutory language ensures these protections apply clearly to all eligible owners. Modernizing gender-specific language in property law reflects current family structures and ensures equitable application of the law. The tie-bar with HJR F'25 (a joint resolution) suggests this may be part of a broader legislative package addressing similar language updates.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope of applicability: Whether "modernized" language expands tenancy by the entireties eligibility beyond traditionally married couples (civil unions, domestic partnerships, etc.) or simply updates pronouns—the bill summary doesn't specify
  • Property rights implications: Any unintended consequences regarding creditor protections, inheritance rights, or spousal claims that could result from rewording statutory language
  • Constitutional tie-bar: The connection to HJR F'25 is unclear from this summary; clarification needed on whether this involves a constitutional amendment process or is merely procedural

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.