WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 3197

Prohibits the use of virtual reality headsets while operating a motor vehicle

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Brad Hoylman-Sigal

Prohibits wearing or using a VR headset while driving to cut in-car distraction and boost safety for drivers and others on public roads.

REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 3197

Summary of S 3197 — Prohibits the use of virtual reality headsets while operating a motor vehicle

What this bill intends to do

S 3197 would prohibit the use of virtual reality (VR) headsets by individuals while operating a motor vehicle. The primary purpose is to reduce driver distraction and enhance road safety by ensuring drivers’ attention is not occupied by VR experiences.

Key provisions (as described)

  • Prohibited conduct: The bill would bar a person from using or wearing a VR headset while in control of a motor vehicle.
  • Scope: Applies to operations of motor vehicles on public roadways (i.e., while driving). (Note: detailed definitions, exceptions, and enforcement mechanisms would be provided in the full text, which is not included in the summary provided.)
  • Penalties and enforcement: The summary does not specify penalties or enforcement procedures. The actual bill text would outline fines, penalties, or license consequences if applicable.
  • Exceptions: Not described in the available information. The full text would state any exceptions (e.g., VR use for passenger or passenger entertainment, official law enforcement or emergency scenarios, or authorized testing).

Who would be affected

  • Drivers operating motor vehicles would be directly impacted.
  • It could also impact vehicle occupants if enforcement captures instances where the driver is wearing a VR headset (depending on the bill’s wording).
  • VR device manufacturers and retailers could face changes in compliance labels or marketing restrictions related to in-vehicle use.

Legislative status and timeline

  • Introduced: November 19, 2025
  • Current status: Referred to Transportation
  • Legislative actions:
    • 2025-01-24: Referred to Transportation
    • 2025-11-19: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
    • 2025-11-19: Introduced in the Senate
  • Primary sponsor: Brad Hoylman-Sigal
  • Related bill: S 8534 (prior-session)

Potential impact and considerations

  • Safety: If enacted, the bill could reduce VR-related distraction accidents and improve driver reaction times.
  • Enforcement: Depending on the text, enforcement could require spotting VR use by drivers or rely on traffic stops; potential need for clear definitions of “virtual reality headset” and “operating a motor vehicle.”
  • Technological and practical considerations: The rise of in-vehicle gaming or augmented reality systems may raise questions about what constitutes prohibited use and whether certain passenger-oriented scenarios are exempt.
  • Policy alignment: Aligns with broader distracted-driving safety efforts and may intersect with existing laws on cellphone use and other in-vehicle distractions.

Note: The summary above reflects the information provided. Full bill text would specify definitions, penalties, exceptions, and effective dates.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.