WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 9190

Prohibits the use of most artificial intelligence in classrooms prior to high school

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Robert Carroll and 5 co-sponsors

Prohibits use of most artificial intelligence in classrooms prior to high school, affecting districts, teachers, students, and AI vendors.

REFERRED TO EDUCATION
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 9190

Summary of Bill A 9190 — Prohibits the use of most artificial intelligence in classrooms prior to high school

Snapshot

  • Bill number: A 9190
  • Title: Prohibits the use of most artificial intelligence in classrooms prior to high school
  • Status: REFERRED TO EDUCATION
  • Introduced: November 3, 2025
  • Primary sponsor: Robert C. Carroll

Purpose and intent

The bill, as indicated by its title, seeks to restrict the use of artificial intelligence tools in classroom settings for students who are below high school grade levels. The stated aim is to limit or prohibit the deployment of most AI applications in pre-high-school education. The exact scope, definitions, and implementation details will be set forth in the bill’s text, which has not been provided in the information available.

Key provisions (pending bill text)

Note: The precise provisions are not included in the information provided. Based on the title, the bill would typically be expected to address:
- A prohibition on the use of “most artificial intelligence” in classrooms serving pre-high-school students (explicit grade range not specified here).
- Definitions of what constitutes “artificial intelligence” for purposes of the law.
- Scope of prohibition (e.g., student-facing tools, teacher-facing tools, classroom hardware, digital platforms, and potentially school-administered systems).
- Possible exemptions or carve-outs (for example, assistive technologies for students with disabilities, accessibility accommodations, safety or security systems, or specific research pilots with waivers).
- Enforcement mechanisms and penalties for noncompliance.
- Effective date or phase-in schedule, if any.
- Provisions for waivers, appeals, or auditing to ensure compliance by schools and districts.

Because the full text is not available, readers should check the official bill language to confirm exact definitions, scope, and any exceptions.

Affected parties

  • Students enrolled in pre-high-school grades (likely elementary and middle school ages, depending on the jurisdiction’s definition of “high school”).
  • School districts, charter schools, and other educational providers serving pre-high-school students.
  • Teachers and school administrators who would be required to avoid or discontinue AI use in classrooms.
  • AI vendors and providers whose products could be subject to a prohibition.
  • Parents and guardians of students in affected grades.

Timeline and procedural notes

  • Introduced on November 3, 2025.
  • Referred to the Education committee on the same date (listed twice in the actions provided, suggesting a standard referral).
  • As a referral to Education, the bill will typically undergo committee review, hearings, and potential amendments before advancing to floor consideration.

Next steps and considerations

  • Review the full bill text to confirm definitions of “artificial intelligence,” the exact grade range affected, and any permitted exceptions.
  • Assess potential impacts on instruction, equity, and access to instructional tools.
  • Identify implementation timeline, funding implications, and compliance requirements for districts.
  • Monitor committee hearings for amendments that could broaden or narrow the prohibition or add exemptions.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to a specific district or provide a side-by-side comparison with similar bills in other states.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.