WeVote

Bill

Bill

A 6902

Prohibits the establishment of new charter schools in certain areas

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Noah Burroughs and 14 co-sponsors

Bars new charter schools in defined areas, reducing school-choice options for students and families while requiring authorizers to enforce the ban.

REFERRED TO EDUCATION
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 6902

Summary of Assembly Bill A 6902

Overview

  • Title: Prohibits the establishment of new charter schools in certain areas
  • Bill number: A 6902
  • Status: Referred to the Education Committee
  • Introduced: March 18, 2025
  • Related companion: S 5987 (Senate)

Purpose and Intent

  • The bill seeks to restrict the creation of new charter schools within defined geographic areas. The exact areas and criteria are specified in the bill’s text (not provided in the summary). The underlying aim is to limit or prevent the establishment of additional charter schools in those targeted areas.

Key Provisions (as implied by the title)

  • Prohibition on establishment: The bill would prohibit the authorization, approval, or establishment of new charter schools in the designated areas.
  • Range of applicability: Likely applies to new charter schools or new charter school campuses/operational establishments within the defined zones. The precise scope (e.g., new charters only, expansions, or conversions) would be detailed in the enacted text.
  • Regulatory and enforcement mechanisms: The bill would establish how the prohibition is to be enforced and which entities (e.g., charter authorizers, state or local education departments) oversee compliance.
  • Definitions: The bill would define terms such as “new charter school,” “establishment,” and the specific geographic areas affected.
  • Effective date and transition: The text would specify when the prohibition takes effect and whether there is a phase-in period or transitional provisions.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Charter schools: New applicants seeking to establish charter schools in the targeted areas would be barred.
  • Charter authorizers: Agencies or bodies responsible for approving new charters would need to enforce the prohibition.
  • Education stakeholders in the affected areas: Potential applicants, school districts, and families seeking alternatives to traditional district schools in those areas.
  • Students: Prospective students in affected areas may have reduced access to newly established charter school options.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Status: Referred to the Education Committee, indicating the bill is in early-stage committee review.
  • Legislative path: As a House Assembly bill with a companion Senate bill (S 5987), passage would require approval by the full Assembly and Senate, followed by any necessary gubernatorial action.
  • Timeline: No floor votes or committee hearing dates are provided in the summary. Monitor for committee hearings, amendments, and potential floor votes.

Sponsors

  • Primary sponsor: Noah Burroughs
  • Cosponsors (selected): Gabriella Romero, Michaelle C. Solages, Dana Levenberg, Kwani O'Pharrow, Charles Lavine, Tommy Schiavoni, Doug Smith, Rebecca Kassay, Steve Stern, John K. Mikulin, Michael Durso, David Weprin, Larinda Hooks, Philip Ramos
  • Notation: Several additional cosponsors listed; a number of sponsors indicate broad support or acknowledgment across different districts.

Related Legislation

  • S 5987 (companion bill in the Senate): Mirrors or closely aligns with A 6902, providing a parallel path through the Senate.

Potential Impacts to Watch

  • Access to school choice: Could reduce the number of new charter options in the targeted areas.
  • School funding and planning: May influence how districts and charter operators plan for capacity and funding in those areas.
  • Policy landscape: Signals a regional or area-specific approach to charter school development that could interact with broader charter policy debates.

Next Steps for Stakeholders

  • Review the full text to identify the exact geographic criteria, definitions, and enforcement provisions.
  • Monitor committee hearings and potential amendments in the Education Committee.
  • Compare with the companion Senate bill S 5987 for consistency and potential negotiated language.
  • Track status updates for any movement toward floor votes or gubernatorial action.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.