WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 571

Prohibits landlords, lessors, sub-lessors and grantors from demanding brokers' fees from a tenant

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Jabari Brisport and 8 co-sponsors

MA S.571 shifts packaging waste costs to producers via an approved program, builds a needs assessment, and expands recycling/composting access for residents and businesses.

REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 571

Summary — S.571 (2025): “An Act to reduce waste and recycling costs in the commonwealth”

Note on discrepancies
- The bill title provided at the top (about prohibiting landlords from demanding brokers’ fees) appears to be unrelated to the bill text and sponsors listed. The official bill text and docket (Senate No. 571, presented by Sal N. DiDomenico) clearly address waste, recycling and packaging management in Massachusetts. This summary is based on the bill text (Senate Docket No. 1774 / S.571) as filed January 16, 2025.

Purpose
- S.571 establishes a statutory framework to reduce municipal waste and recycling costs by shifting aspects of packaging management toward producers and by improving statewide coordination and infrastructure for recycling, composting, and other end‑of‑life pathways for packaging and paper products.

Key provisions (as shown in the bill text)
- Inserts new sections (330–345) into Chapter 94 of the Massachusetts General Laws, beginning with a comprehensive definitions section that frames the rest of the act.
- Definitions and scope:
- Defines “covered materials” to include packaging and paper products sold or distributed to consumers in the state (including online sales), subject to certain federal exclusions (e.g., FDA/USDA regulated medical or animal biologic packaging, FIFRA-regulated packaging).
- Defines “covered entities” (residences, schools, municipal buildings, public spaces, small businesses, hospitality locations), “collector,” “material recovery facility,” “composting facility,” “compostable material” (meeting ASTM D6400/D6868 or successors), and other operational terms.
- Specifies an environmental justice community definition using household income, minority population, limited English proficiency, and combined income/minority thresholds.
- Producer responsibility and collection options:
- Establishes the concept of an “alternative collection program” — a producer-operated or producer-group program that must be approved by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) under later sections.
- Planning and data:
- Requires a statewide “needs assessment” (NA) to evaluate volumes/types of covered materials, current management pathways (recycling, composting, landfilling, incineration), associated costs and revenues, access levels, and infrastructure capacity — including projections and recommendations to meet waste reduction goals.
- Allows for nondisclosure agreements for commercially sensitive data submitted for the needs assessment, while providing for statutory exceptions.
- Accessibility standard:
- Establishes “convenience” as a principle (recycling access wherever trash disposal is provided), indicating an intent to improve ease of access to recycling/composting.

Who would be affected
- Producers/brand owners of packaging and paper products (new regulatory and program responsibilities).
- Municipalities and private collectors/haulers (changes in roles, potential cost shifts).
- Residents, schools, small businesses, hospitality venues, and public spaces (access to improved recycling/composting programs).
- Material recovery and composting facilities (standards, acceptance criteria, infrastructure planning).
- Environmental justice communities (explicitly considered in definitions and likely in program design).

Procedural status and timeline (from docket)
- Filed: 01/16/2025 (Senate Docket No. 1774 / S.571).
- Introduced in Senate and read twice: 02/13/2025; referred to Judiciary and earlier to Environment & Natural Resources.
- Hearing scheduled: 05/06/2025 (A‑1).
- Reported favorably by committee and referred to Senate Ways & Means: 09/18/2025.
- Note: Some listed legislative actions/dates in the provided metadata are inconsistent or duplicated; this summary reflects the bill’s key filing and committee steps shown in the docket.

Potential impacts and considerations
- If fully enacted, the bill would likely advance an extended producer responsibility (EPR) approach for packaging in Massachusetts — shifting financial and operational responsibility away from municipalities toward producers or their programs.
- Could increase statewide recycling and composting access and reduce municipal budget burdens for curbside recycling and waste management.
- Implementation will depend on DEP rulemaking, approval processes for producer-run programs, the outcomes of the statewide needs assessment, and details in subsequent sections (330–345 reference further provisions not fully included in the excerpt).

For more detail
- The full bill text (complete sections 330–346) and subsequent DEP regulations will be needed to determine specific producer obligations, fee structures, reporting requirements, timelines for compliance, and enforcement mechanisms.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.