Prohibits co-pays for certain short term opioid drug prescriptions
Creates a 17-member commission to study double poles, identify removal timelines and barriers, and propose actions; final report and any legislation due by June 30, 2026.
Creates a 17-member commission to study double poles, identify removal timelines and barriers, and propose actions; final report and any legislation due by June 30, 2026.
Status snapshot
- Origin: Massachusetts Senate docket No. 2315 (filed January 17, 2025) — presented by Sen. Jacob R. Oliveira.
- Committee referral: Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy (bill text); some public tracking shows additional referrals/hearings — see note on inconsistent metadata below.
- Required deliverable: Commission report and any proposed legislation due to the Legislature by June 30, 2026.
Note on metadata: Some accompanying metadata in the request (titles, sponsors, referral history) appears inconsistent or from other jurisdictions/sessions. The text of S.2315 in the Massachusetts 194th General Court clearly establishes a special commission on “double poles.” Confirm current status on the official Massachusetts Legislature website for the latest procedural actions.
Purpose and intent
- Create a 17‑member special commission to study and investigate the prevalence, causes, processes and regulatory barriers related to “double poles” — situations where two utility poles (old and new) remain standing after service transfers — and to identify timelines and remedies for their removal.
Key provisions
- Commission duties (non‑exhaustive):
- Inventory how many double poles exist and how long each has been in place.
- Determine reasons double poles remain and examine the process/timeline for removing old poles after services move to new poles.
- Evaluate enforcement of Section 34B, Chapter 164 (statutory requirements concerning timely pole removal).
- Assess whether current removal timelines are reasonable and adequate.
- Investigate barriers to removal (coordination, legal, contractual, technical).
- Explore improvements to attachment management systems (e.g., National Joint Utilities Notification System, NJUNS) and communications among stakeholders.
- Examine unlicensed/abandoned attachments, prompt registration requirements, indemnification agreements, liability issues, and whether certain costs of removal may be recovered from ratepayers.
- Consider needed rulemaking by the Department of Public Utilities (DPU) and the Department of Telecommunications and Cable to regulate double poles effectively.
- Membership (17 total), including:
- Executive branch designees (Secretary of Administration & Finance; Chair of DPU; Commissioner of the Department of Telecommunications & Cable),
- Legislative members (chairs of the Joint Committee on Municipalities & Regional Government; 2 House members; 2 Senate members),
- Municipal and industry representatives (municipal light board rep; 3 municipal officials appointed by the governor; utility pole owner; pole attacher; Massachusetts Municipal Association executive director or designee),
- One private citizen appointed by the governor to chair the commission, who must not be an employee of any electric or telecommunications utility in the Commonwealth.
Timing and deliverables
- Final commission report with recommendations and any proposed legislation must be filed with legislative clerks and relevant committee chairs by June 30, 2026.
Who is affected
- Utility pole owners (electric and communications utilities), attaching providers (telecommunications, broadband, cable), municipal governments and municipal light boards, regulators (DPU; Department of Telecommunications & Cable), ratepayers (potential cost implications), and the public (safety/visual impacts).
Potential impacts and issues to watch
- Improved identification and removal of abandoned/double poles could enhance public safety, right‑of‑way management, and broadband deployment coordination.
- Recommendations might propose regulatory changes, cost‑recovery mechanisms, or strengthened enforcement—each with potential financial impacts on utilities, attachers, municipalities, and ratepayers.
- Legal/contractual tools (indemnity agreements, enforcement mechanisms) and better use of systems like NJUNS may be recommended to resolve coordination failures.
For more information
- Verify current bill status, any amendments, hearing records, and the commission’s membership appointments on the Massachusetts Legislature website or committee pages.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.