WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 3175

Prohibit public utilities from making political or charitable contributions

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Jim Butler and 9 co-sponsors

Expands automated school-bus crossing enforcement, raising civil penalties, strengthens evidence with online image access and a rebuttable stop-signal presumption to deter violatio

To House Judiciary
#utilities
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 3175

Summary — HB 3175 (VEH CD‑PASSING SCHOOL BUS)

Status: Introduced Feb. 2025; Passed Illinois House (107–0) on Apr. 10, 2025; arrived in Senate Apr. 14, 2025. Chief sponsors and co‑sponsors updated during floor action (Rep. Ann M. Williams, Rep. Michael J. Kelly, Rep. Thaddeus Jones added as co‑sponsor). Companion: HB 3219.

Purpose

Amend Section 11‑208.9 of the Illinois Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/11‑208.9) to expand use and evidentiary weight of automated traffic law enforcement systems for arrests/penalties related to overtaking/passing stopped school buses, tighten notice timing rules, increase civil penalties, and clarify evidentiary procedures and defenses.

Key provisions

  • Definition and evidence

    • Confirms an "automated traffic law enforcement system" produces recorded images (photos/video) showing a motor vehicle violating school‑bus passing/overtaking rules and must display time, date, location, and clearly identify the license plate.
    • Recorded images must be made accessible to alleged violators via an internet website link provided in the notice.

  • Notice timing and contents

    • The county/municipality that records a violation must mail written notice to the registered vehicle owner within 30 days after the municipality/county confirms the owner's identity (changed from 30 days after Secretary of State notification), and in no event later than 90 days after the violation.
    • Required notice items include: owner name/address, vehicle registration number, charged violation, location, date/time, copy of recorded images, civil penalty amount and payment deadline, statement that images are evidence, warnings about consequences of non‑response, and options to pay or challenge (court, mail, or administrative hearing).

  • Presumptions and penalties

    • Establishes a rebuttable presumption that a school bus was stopped to load/unload pupils and its visual signals were operating if recorded images show (1) an activated stop signal arm and (2) an electronic indicator showing activation of school bus visual signals.
    • Mandatory civil penalties: $300 for a first offense (previously "not exceeding $150"); $1,000 for a second or subsequent offense (previously "not exceeding $500"). Additional penalty up to $100 for untimely payment.
    • Violations adjudicated under this Section are not recorded on the owner's driving record but may be recorded by the municipality/county to assess repeat‑offense higher fines.

  • Evidence, confidentiality, and defenses

    • Recorded images and the notice are admissible evidence.
    • Recorded images are confidential and available to the alleged violator and governmental/law enforcement agencies; usable in proceedings from the citation.
    • Permitted defenses include stolen plates, hijacking (with timely law enforcement report), driver having received a Uniform Traffic Citation for the same statutory violation within one‑eighth mile and 15 minutes of the automated record, or that school bus visual signals were absent/inoperable/damaged. Proof requirements (e.g., police report) are specified.

  • Signage and notice obligations

    • School buses equipped with automated enforcement must be posted with a sign indicating monitoring. (Municipality/county notice to drivers is required — statutory text for broader public notice truncated in the available version.)

Who is affected

  • Motor vehicle owners/operators who pass or overtake stopped school buses — increased likelihood of civil penalties based on automated camera evidence.
  • Municipalities/counties implementing or operating automated school bus enforcement systems (responsible for notices, website access, recordkeeping).
  • School districts and bus operators where buses use automated enforcement systems (signage requirements, operational procedures).

Procedural / timeline notes

  • Bill introduced in February 2025, passed the House unanimously Apr. 10, 2025, and was transmitted to the Senate Apr. 14, 2025 (referred to Assignments). Additional committee referrals listed include Public Health in March 2025. Co‑sponsors were added during the bill’s House progress.

Potential impacts

  • Increases civil penalties substantially, likely strengthening deterrence and increasing municipal revenue from enforcement.
  • Strengthens evidentiary framework (rebuttable presumption, online access to images) which may expedite adjudication but raises questions about privacy/confidentiality and due process procedures for contesting automated citations.
  • Reinforces school‑bus safety enforcement via automated systems and signage requirements.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.