WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 3456

PROCUREMENT PROTECTION ACT

104th Regular Session Introduced by Jason Plummer

SB 3456 establishes a statutory procurement protection framework to ensure fair, transparent bidding, prohibit improper influence, and enforce accountability in state contracting.

Referred to Assignments
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 3456

Overview

SB 3456 (104th Illinois General Assembly) is titled the Procurement Protection Act. Filed and referred in February 2026, the measure appears to address protections related to procurement processes within the state. The bill lists Sen. Jason Plummer as the sponsor, with a co-sponsor in Plummer as well (likely indicating leadership or authoring role within the sponsor’s offices).

Note: The available information provided includes the bill’s title, sponsor details, and basic filing/assignment history. The summary below synthesizes likely intent and typical features of a procurement protection framework, but specific statutory text, definitions, and exact provisions would be found in the bill’s actual language as filed with the Secretary of the Senate.

Purpose and Intent

  • Establish protections within state procurement to promote fairness, transparency, and integrity in contracting processes.
  • Aim to safeguard procurement activities from improper influence, conflict of interest, or discriminatory practices.
  • Create a statutory framework that guides how contracts are advertised, bid, evaluated, awarded, and monitored.

Key Provisions (Expected Framework)

While the exact text is not provided in the summary, bills with procurement protection goals commonly include the following elements:

  • Definitions:
    • Clarification of terms such as “procurement,” “bid,” “contract,” “supplier,” “contact,” and “prohibited practices.”
  • Fair Competition and Integrity:
    • Prohibition of activities that compromise competitive bidding (e.g., collusion, bid-rigging, improper influence).
    • Requirements for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest by procurement officials and contractors.
  • Bid Process Requirements:
    • Standards for advertising solicitations, bid submission deadlines, and bid evaluation criteria.
    • Transparency measures such as publicly posted evaluation criteria and award notices.
  • Provider Protections:
    • Protections for bidders from retaliation or improper influence when participating in state procurement.
    • Provisions for debriefings or appeal processes if bidders believe procurement decisions were unfair.
  • Anti-Corruption and Enforcement:
    • Penalties or disciplinary actions for violations of procurement laws.
    • Roles for inspector general, state procurement officers, or ethics commissions to investigate potential breaches.
  • Accountability and Reporting:
    • Mandatory reporting on procurement outcomes, contract awards, and performance metrics.
    • Auditing provisions to ensure compliance with procurement rules.

Who Is Affected

  • State agencies and departments that engage in purchasing and contracting.
  • Vendors, bidders, and contractors seeking state contracts.
  • Procurement officials, including buyers, contract managers, and evaluators.
  • Oversight bodies (e.g., state ethics or inspector general offices) responsible for enforcement and audits.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Action History:
    • Filed with the Secretary by Sen. Jason Plummer on 2026-02-05.
    • First Reading and referral to Assignments on 2026-02-05.
  • Next steps (typical process for Illinois bills):
    • Assignment to a committee (referred to Assignments or a substantive committee).
    • Committee hearings, amendments, and potential passage.
    • Floor consideration by the Senate, then onward to the House (if applicable), and eventual enactment or veto.
  • Specific deadlines, hearing dates, and fiscal impact analyses would be determined as the bill moves through committee and chamber proceedings.

Potential Impacts and Considerations

  • Aims to enhance trust in state procurement by reducing opportunities for improper influence and ensuring level playing field for bidders.
  • Could introduce new compliance requirements for agencies and vendors, including disclosures and audits.
  • Possible costs associated with implementing additional oversight, training for procurement staff, and system changes for transparency.
  • Legal and administrative implications for alleged procurement violations, including enforcement and remedies.

If you have access to the bill text, I can extract precise sections, definitions, and specific provisions to refine this summary with exact language, thresholds, and timelines.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.