WeVote
Log In

Bill

AA

Bill

HB 4911

Probate: guardians and conservators; appointment; modify procedure. Amends secs. 5303, 5304, 5306, 5306a, 5312 & 5416 of 1998 PA 386 (MCL 700.5303 et seq.).

2023-2024 Regular Session Introduced by Abraham Aiyash and 51 co-sponsors

HB 4911 S-2 tightens Michigan guardianship rules by standardizing petitions and clinician-led evaluations, speeding hearings, and clarifying temporary/emergency guardians.

REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE WITH SUBSTITUTE (S-2)
#probate:guardiansandconservators
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 4911

Summary — HB 4911 (Senate Substitute S-2)

Status: Referred to Committee of the Whole with substitute (S-2)
Introduced: (per file) March 13, 2025 (bill package originally introduced 2023)
Subject: Amendments to the Estates and Protected Individuals Code (EPIC) — guardianship/incapacity procedures (amends MCL 700.5303, 700.5304, 700.5306, 700.5306a, 700.5312, 700.5416)

Purpose

HB 4911 (S-2) revises procedures and protections in Michigan guardianship proceedings. It seeks to standardize petition and evaluation requirements, strengthen procedural safeguards for alleged incapacitated persons, and clarify temporary/emergency guardian processes.

Key provisions

  • Petition requirements

    • A petition to find incapacity must state specific facts about the person’s condition and concrete examples of recent conduct showing the need for a guardian or standby guardian.
    • Before filing, courts must provide the prospective filer written information about less‑restrictive alternatives (e.g., limited guardianship, conservatorship, patient advocate designation, durable power of attorney, POLST/DNR).

  • Hearings and scheduling

    • On filing, the court must set an initial hearing on incapacity.
    • At that initial hearing, the court must set a trial date at least 7 days after the initial hearing if the guardian ad litem, the alleged incapacitated person (or their counsel), or the court requests it.
    • If a trial date is set, the court must enter a scheduling order and, where practicable, provide for the alleged incapacitated person’s attendance.

  • Independent evaluations and reports (Section 5304)

    • Courts may order an examination by a court‑appointed physician or mental health professional; the written report must be submitted at least 5 days before the hearing.
    • An alleged incapacitated person may obtain an independent evaluation at personal expense or, if indigent, at public expense. Publicly funded independent evaluations must be performed by a physician or mental health professional.
    • Required contents for evaluation reports are detailed and include cognitive/functional abilities, how impairments affect decisionmaking, medications and their behavioral effects (if prepared by clinician), prognosis/rehabilitation recommendations, signatures, dates, duration of examiner contact, capacity to assign or delegate for well‑being, and whether advance‑care documents exist.
    • The court must not consider an evaluation that does not substantially comply with these content requirements.

  • Rights and process protections

    • The alleged incapacitated person is entitled to be present (and to have the hearing moved if necessary), to legal counsel, to present evidence and cross‑examine witnesses, and to request a closed hearing without a jury.
    • Clear‑and‑convincing standard reiterated for finding incapacity and necessity of guardianship.

  • Temporary and emergency guardians (Sections 5306a, 5312, 5416 — as amended in S-2 and described in committee reports)

    • The bill authorizes limited temporary guardianships in specified circumstances (e.g., when a person retains capacity for certain transactions such as executing a power of attorney).
    • Emergency guardian procedures are revised to allow interested persons to petition, require petitions/orders to comply with court rules governing temporary restraining orders, and permit appointment after hearing or, when warranted by the evidence, without notice to the allegedly incapacitated person.
    • Temporary guardianships are subject to explicit time limits and trial/notice safeguards in related sections.

Who is affected

  • Alleged incapacitated individuals (wards)
  • Petitioners and family members seeking guardianship
  • Probate courts, judges, and court staff
  • Physicians, mental health professionals, and court‑appointed examiners
  • Guardians, standby and temporary guardians, and guardians ad litem
  • Legal counsel (including appointed counsel for indigent respondents)

Procedural/timeline notes and fiscal impact

  • The substitute requires earlier and more detailed submissions (evaluation reports 5 days before hearing) and faster scheduling (trial date within 7 days of initial hearing when requested), which may change court timelines.
  • Committee analyses describe an indeterminate fiscal impact on state and local courts (possible increases in filings, evaluations at public expense, or administrative workload).
  • The S-2 substitute is part of a multi‑bill package addressing guardianship/conservatorship reforms; committee reports note these bills are tie‑barred and generally would take effect one year after enactment.

Bottom line

HB 4911 (S-2) tightens procedural safeguards in incapacity and guardianship proceedings by requiring more detailed petitions, standardized and clinician‑oriented evaluation reports, explicit scheduling rules, and clarified temporary/emergency guardian procedures — aiming to increase protections for alleged incapacitated persons while formalizing court processes.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.