WeVote

Bill

Bill

AB 1759

Prisons: classification.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Sade Elhawary

AB 1759 commissions an independent study to redesign prison security classification to prioritize rehabilitation, reduce unnecessary confinement, and expand programming.

Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · AB 1759

AB 1759 (2025-2026) — Prisons: classification

Purpose and intent

AB 1759 would require a comprehensive review of California’s state prison security classification system. The bill aims to ensure that classification decisions reflect actual safety risk and do not unnecessarily confine incarcerated people to higher-security facilities. It also seeks to align classifications with rehabilitation goals and potential cost savings by expanding access to programming.

Key provisions and changes

  • Department obligation: The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) must contract with an independent research entity to reassess the entire current security classification system. The study would cover:
    • Initial classification
    • Annual classification and reclassification
    • Methodologies used for annual reclassification point adjustments and the use of administrative determinants and overrides
  • Study objectives and policy recommendations:
    • Develop policy recommendations to enhance the classification system
    • Propose a new classification framework with goals to:
    • Expand access to rehabilitation
    • Reduce recidivism and violence
    • Ensure inmates are not housed at unnecessarily high security levels
    • Improve institutional safety by accurately identifying higher-risk individuals
    • Save state funds by enabling more programming credits that can reduce sentence length
  • Selection of research entity:
    • The Office of the Inspector General would select the independent entity
    • Eligible entities must have:
    • Research institutions affiliated with California State University (CSU) or the University of California (UC)
    • Governance by the UC Board of Regents
    • Experience partnering with government agencies
    • A commitment to equity and demonstrated expertise in CDCR policy and data
  • Reporting timeline:
    • A final report with findings and recommendations must be published on CDCR’s website and submitted to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2028
    • Reports must comply with Government Code Section 9795
    • The provisions would remain in effect only temporarily, repealing on January 1, 2029 (2031 in some date references), indicating a sunset provision contingent on the statutory language in the final version
  • Context and findings informing the bill:
    • The bill references concerns from a 2019 LAO study that the current security classification may over-restrict inmates and that its methodology has not been regularly reassessed

Who/what is affected

  • Primary: CDCR and incarcerated individuals in state prisons
  • Secondary: The Office of the Inspector General (selection authority for the study), the independent research entity, and the Legislature (receiving the study findings)
  • Broader impact: Potential changes to prison population placement, access to rehabilitative programming, and eligibility for programming credits

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Legislative history shows committee referrals and approvals with a targeted study timeline
  • Key deadline: report due by January 1, 2028 (with compliance to Government Code timing)
  • Sunset: the bill includes automatic repeal provisions after the specified sunset date

Summary assessment

AB 1759 shifts the state’s approach from maintaining an existing, potentially outdated security classification framework to commissioning a rigorous, independent, academically tied study with explicit rehabilitation and safety outcomes. If enacted, it could lead to a redesigned classification system that prioritizes rehabilitation, reduces unnecessary confinement, and potentially lowers costs through expanded programming.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.