WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 1994

Prisons and Reformatory Institutions - As introduced, prohibits this state or a local government from entering into a new contract or renewing an existing contract for the provision of correctional services for an inmate under the custody and care of the department of correction or the local government. - Amends TCA Title 41, Chapter 24.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by London Lamar

Tennessee bill prohibits new or renewed private prison contracts, requiring state to operate all correctional facilities directly and potentially increasing budget demands.

Assigned to General Subcommittee of Senate State and Local Government Committee
#prisonsandreformatoryinstitutions
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1994

Legislative bill overview

SB 1994 prohibits Tennessee and its local governments from entering into new contracts or renewing existing contracts with private companies to operate correctional facilities or provide inmate care services. The bill effectively moves toward eliminating private prison contracts in the state.

Why is this important

Tennessee currently relies on private prisons to house a portion of its inmate population. This bill would phase out that system, potentially requiring the state to build and operate additional public facilities or reduce incarceration rates. The shift affects significant spending, operational control, and employment in the corrections sector.

Potential points of contention

  • Cost implications: Private prisons often cite lower operational costs; eliminating them may increase state budget demands for corrections or require tax increases
  • Prison capacity: If private facilities cannot be renewed, Tennessee must have adequate public prison capacity or face overcrowding and potential legal liability
  • Job displacement: Private prison employees could face layoffs, while the state must hire and train new correctional officers, affecting local economies
  • Ideological divide: Supporters argue public operation improves accountability and rehabilitation; opponents contend private competition increases efficiency and innovation
  • Existing contract obligations: Abruptly ending contracts may trigger financial penalties or legal challenges from private corrections companies

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.