WeVote

Bill

Bill

A 3269

Precludes inadmissible statements made by defendants because of false information and requires data collection of recorded interrogations

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Chris Burdick and 3 co-sponsors

Bill A 3269 protects defendants by excluding coerced statements from court and mandates data collection on interrogations for transparency in law enforcement practices.

REFERRED TO CODES
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 3269

Summary of Bill A 3269

Bill Information

  • Bill Number: A 3269
  • Title: Precludes inadmissible statements made by defendants because of false information and requires data collection of recorded interrogations
  • Status: Referred to Codes
  • Introduced: January 27, 2025
  • Classification: Bill

Purpose and Intent

Bill A 3269 aims to enhance the integrity of the criminal justice system by addressing issues related to the admissibility of statements made by defendants during interrogations. The bill specifically seeks to prevent the use of statements that may have been coerced or influenced by false information provided by law enforcement officials. Additionally, it mandates the collection of data regarding recorded interrogations to ensure transparency and accountability in the interrogation process.

Key Provisions

  1. Exclusion of Inadmissible Statements:

    • The bill stipulates that any statements made by a defendant during an interrogation that were influenced by false information provided by law enforcement cannot be admitted as evidence in court.
  2. Data Collection Requirements:

    • Law enforcement agencies will be required to collect and maintain data on all recorded interrogations. This includes:
      • The number of interrogations conducted
      • The duration of each interrogation
      • The outcomes of the interrogations (e.g., charges filed, confessions obtained)
      • Any instances where false information was provided to the defendant
  3. Reporting:

    • Agencies will be required to submit annual reports summarizing the collected data to ensure oversight and facilitate analysis of interrogation practices.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Defendants: Individuals undergoing interrogation will benefit from protections against the use of coerced statements.
  • Law Enforcement Agencies: Police departments and other agencies will need to adjust their interrogation practices and comply with new data collection requirements.
  • Judicial System: Courts will see changes in how evidence is evaluated, particularly concerning statements made during interrogations.

Procedural Aspects

  • The bill was introduced on January 27, 2025, and has been referred to the Codes Committee for further consideration. The timeline for further legislative action is currently undetermined.

Related Bills

  • S 6806: A related bill from the prior session that may address similar issues.
  • A 6570: Another prior-session bill that could have overlapping provisions.
  • A 1156: A previous legislative effort that may relate to interrogation practices.
  • S 1860: A companion bill that may provide additional context or support for the provisions outlined in A 3269.

This summary provides an overview of Bill A 3269, highlighting its objectives, key provisions, and potential impacts on the criminal justice system.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.