WeVote

Bill

Bill

HF 778

Plymouth; public infrastructure improvements funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Kristin Bahner and 3 co-sponsors

Provides funding and issues bonds for Plymouth public infrastructure improvements, with designated appropriations to plan, construct, and manage projects within Plymouth.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Capital Investment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 778

Summary of HF 778 (2025-2026) – Minnesota

Title

Plymouth; public infrastructure improvements funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated

Purpose and Intent

HF 778 authorizes funding for public infrastructure improvements in the city of Plymouth. The bill outlines the issuance of bonds and the appropriation of money to support specified infrastructure projects, with the goal of planning, constructing, and enhancing public facilities and related services.

Key Provisions and Changes

  • Funding Authorization: The bill provides for public funding to be used for infrastructure improvements in Plymouth. This typically includes projects such as roads, bridges, utilities, sidewalks, parks, and related public works.
  • Bond Issuance: The bill authorizes the issuance of bonds to finance the infrastructure projects. This implies the creation of debt obligations to be repaid over time, funded by state or local sources as described in the act.
  • Appropriations: It designates specific appropriations (dollar amounts, timeframes, and sources) to support the approved projects. The appropriations enable planning, design, construction, and potential maintenance of the infrastructure.
  • Project Scope (Plymouth): Projects are limited to those within the jurisdiction of Plymouth, Minnesota, and likely identified in the bill’s official project list or schedule.
  • Required Process: As a Capital Investment bill, it would typically follow standard legislative processes for capital investments, including detailed project justification, cost estimates, and alignment with statewide infrastructure/transportation goals.

Who or What Would Be Affected

  • City of Plymouth: Primary beneficiary and executer of the authorized projects. The city would manage project delivery, bond repayment, and compliance with grant/appropriation conditions.
  • Residents and Businesses in Plymouth: Indirectly affected through improved infrastructure, potential construction activity, and enhanced public services.
  • State and Local Financing Structures: Interaction with state bonding programs and any required fiscal oversight or reporting tied to bond issuance and project expenditures.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and Referral: HF 778 was introduced and referred to the Capital Investment committee on February 13, 2025.
  • Legislative Process: As a capital investment bill, it would progress through committee hearings, potential amendments, and Floor consideration. If passed, it would move to the other chamber (Senate) for consideration under Minnesota’s legislative process.
  • Bond and Funding Timeline: Specific bond sale schedules, interest rates, and repayment terms would be defined in accompanying fiscal notes or authorizing language within the bill or subsequent related legislation.

Notes and Considerations

  • The summary assumes standard Minnesota Capital Investment (bonding) practices. The exact project list, bond terms, interest rates, repayment schedules, and annual indebtedness limits would be detailed in the bill text and any accompanying fiscal impact statements.
  • The bill lists four sponsors (co-sponsors) who may influence deliberations and amendments during committee proceedings.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to include hypothetical project categories (e.g., roads, parks, water/sewer upgrades) or pull in any available fiscal notes to provide more precise financial figures and timelines.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.