WeVote

Bill

WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1008

Summary of SB 1008 (2025, North Carolina) – Pilot for Shoreline Stabilization Projects

Purpose and intent

SB 1008 establishes a pilot program to support shoreline stabilization projects in designated areas. The bill aims to enable targeted testing and evaluation of shoreline stabilization techniques to protect coastal properties, infrastructure, and ecosystems while considering environmental and public interests. The pilot is intended to inform broader policy options and potential future funding or regulatory approaches for shoreline stabilization statewide.

Key provisions and changes

  • Pilot program authorization: Creates a state-level framework to implement shoreline stabilization projects as a defined pilot, including criteria for selecting sites and guiding project implementation.
  • Site selection and governance: Establishes processes for identifying candidate shorelines, coordinating with local governments, agencies, and stakeholders, and determining oversight responsibilities during the pilot.
  • Project scope and techniques: Allows a range of stabilization approaches (e.g., structural, natural or nature-based features, and hybrid methods) consistent with environmental protections and safety standards. Specifications may include design criteria, performance expectations, and maintenance responsibilities.
  • Funding and cost sharing: Sets forth potential funding mechanisms, which may involve state funds, federal programs, or cost-sharing with local governments or private entities. Availability, limits, and replenishment provisions (if any) would be described in the bill text or accompanying fiscal notes.
  • Permitting and regulatory compliance: Streamlines or clarifies permitting requirements for pilot projects, while ensuring compliance with environmental, public safety, and coastal management laws.
  • Monitoring and evaluation: Requires data collection and evaluation of project performance, environmental impacts, and cost-effectiveness to inform potential expansion or modification of shoreline stabilization policy.
  • Reporting and oversight: Mandates periodic reporting to the General Assembly or relevant state agencies on pilot progress, expenditures, and outcomes.
  • Sunset or end date: Specifies the duration of the pilot or criteria for transitioning to a broader program, including evaluation benchmarks.

Who would be affected

  • Coastal local governments and property owners: Potentially eligible sites and beneficiaries of stabilization projects, including reduced erosion risk and protected infrastructure.
  • State agencies and departments: Involved in program administration, permitting, funding oversight, and monitoring (e.g., environmental, coastal management, and natural resources agencies).
  • Consultants and contractors: Entities engaged in design, construction, monitoring, and maintenance of stabilization projects.
  • Taxpayers and ratepayers: Potential funding implications depending on state and local cost-sharing arrangements.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Sponsor information: Co-sponsors listed (Bob Brinson, Bobby Hanig, Michael Lazzara) indicating bipartisan or cross-chamber support considerations.
  • Filed date: 2026-04-30, marking the formal introduction and progression point in the session.
  • Pilot lifecycle: The bill outlines a start-to-end process for the pilot, including site selection, implementation, monitoring, reporting, and a sunset or transition clause to determine whether to scale up.

This summary reflects the bill’s stated aims and typical components of a shoreline stabilization pilot program. For a complete understanding, reviewing the exact bill text, fiscal notes, and any amendments or committee analyses would be necessary to capture precise statutory language, funding amounts, site criteria, and evaluation metrics.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.