WeVote

Bill

Bill

H 4459

Penn Center Heritage parade

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Michael Rivers

Designates the second Saturday in November as Penn Center Heritage Day and requires a local parade on that date each year.

Referred to Committee on Education and Public Works
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 4459

Summary — H 4459: "Penn Center Heritage Day" (Parade requirement)

Status: Referred to Committee on Education and Public Works
Bill Number: H 4459
Sponsor: Rep. Thomas P. Walsh (primary)
Key procedural dates: introduced 04/30/2025; substituted 08/28/2025; placed in Orders 09/02/2025; read second and ordered to third reading 10/16/2025. Effective date: upon Governor’s approval (if enacted).

Note on source material: the submitted bill text contains two distinct texts combined in one document. One portion is an amendment to the South Carolina Code establishing an annual parade for Penn Center Heritage Day. Another portion (longer) appears to be a Massachusetts municipal charter amendment for the town of Seekonk (changing “Board of Selectmen” to “Select Board,” updating pronouns, and revising Town Administrator duties). The summary below focuses on the Penn Center Heritage Day provisions (the bill title) and then briefly notes the unrelated charter language included in the file.

What the bill would do (Penn Center Heritage Day)
- Amends S.C. Code § 53-3-230 to specify that the second Saturday in November of each year is designated “Penn Center Heritage Day.”
- Adds a mandatory requirement that, on that date each year, there must be a parade honoring Penn Center Heritage Day.
- Directs that the parade route is to be determined by the local governing body (i.e., the municipality or county where the parade occurs).
- Takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

Purpose / intent
- To promote and preserve Penn Center’s history and culture by instituting an annual, formal public commemoration that includes a parade.

Who is affected
- Penn Center and its cultural/educational partners (benefit from formal recognition and publicity).
- Local governments (responsible for determining parade route and overseeing permit/traffic/safety arrangements).
- Law enforcement, public safety, public works (traffic control, crowd management, cleanup).
- Local businesses, residents, and parade participants (short-term disruptions and potential economic/tourism benefits).
- State budget: no appropriation included in the bill; fiscal impacts (permits, policing, cleanup) are expected to be borne at the local level unless separately funded.

Key implications and considerations
- The statute uses mandatory language (“there must be a parade”), which imposes an annual expectation but does not specify funding, enforcement mechanisms, or exceptions (e.g., weather, public health emergencies).
- Local governing bodies retain control over route planning, which preserves local discretion over logistics and public-safety measures.
- No state-level funding or administrative oversight is provided in the text; costs and operational responsibilities fall to local authorities and event organizers.
- If enacted, the law becomes effective upon the Governor’s signature.

Unrelated content in file
- The bill file also includes extensive amendments to the Town of Seekonk’s charter (Massachusetts): replacing “Board of Selectmen” with “Select Board,” changing gendered pronouns (e.g., “himself” to “themself”), and revising Town Administrator duties (attendance at Select Board meetings, supervisory language). That municipal charter language appears unrelated to the Penn Center Heritage Day subject and may reflect a filing or drafting error.

If you want, I can:
- Produce a short fiscal-impact estimate for local governments, or
- Draft suggested amendment language to add funding/contingency provisions (e.g., exceptions, state/local cost-sharing, public-safety requirements).

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.