Bill
S 11
Expands SC paid parental leave eligibility to any state employee in positions earning annual leave, including many temporary or adjunct staff.
Note on source materials
- The packet you provided contains text from two different measures in different jurisdictions: (A) a South Carolina statutory bill amending the paid parental leave statute (S.C. Code §8-11-150), and (B) a Massachusetts proposal for a constitutional amendment concerning valuation of agricultural and horticultural lands (Senate Docket No. 1673 / Senate No. 11). The title you gave (“Paid Family Leave Eligible State Employee”) corresponds to the South Carolina bill. This summary focuses on the South Carolina paid parental leave bill, and a brief separate note summarizes the Massachusetts constitutional amendment included in the materials.
Purpose and intent
- To expand and clarify who counts as an “eligible state employee” for purposes of the state paid parental leave benefit, thereby extending paid parental leave to additional categories of state workers.
Key provisions
- Definition change: Replaces the prior definition that limited eligibility to “an employee occupying any percentage of a full-time equivalent position” with a definition covering “any person employed by any department, institution, commission, board, or any other unit of government of this State who occupies a position eligible to earn annual leave.” This explicitly includes employees of state-controlled four‑year/postgraduate institutions and state-supported technical colleges who occupy positions eligible to earn annual leave.
- Paid parental leave amounts (unchanged in substance in the text shown): either six weeks at 100% of base pay or two weeks at 100% of base pay (part‑time leave prorated to normal scheduled hours).
- “Child” and “qualifying event” definitions reiterate: newborn biological child or foster child in state custody under age 18; no child may have more than two parents eligible for paid parental leave.
- Effective date (as amended by committee): Act takes effect October 1, 2025, and applies to qualifying events on or after that date.
Who is affected
- Newly eligible: employees in positions that earn annual leave — including many time‑limited, temporary, grant‑funded, or adjunct positions at state higher‑education institutions that previously may have been excluded.
- State agencies/institutions: may face increased short‑term personnel or overtime costs to cover work of employees on leave and potential increased payouts for unused annual leave when employees separate.
- Fiscal note: DRA/Revenue & Fiscal Affairs Office reports uncertainty in total cost — depends on how many newly eligible employees use leave and how agencies cover workloads. In 2024, 958 state employees used paid parental leave; data show some leave users separate shortly afterward, generating payouts. The amendment may increase such payouts and operational costs; total impact is undetermined.
Procedural status and timeline (selected)
- Introduced / read first time: Jan 14, 2025.
- Referred to Senate Finance; Committee report (favorable with amendment): March 26, 2025.
- Committee amendment modified the eligible‑employee definition and set the effective date to Oct 1, 2025.
- If enacted, applies to qualifying events occurring on/after October 1, 2025.
Purpose
- To amend Article XCIX of the Massachusetts Constitution (an amendment regarding taxation/valuation of agricultural and horticultural land).
Key provisions (as proposed)
- Replaces existing Article XCIX with language that:
- Grants the General Court authority to allow agricultural/horticultural parcels to be valued for tax purposes according to their agricultural/horticultural uses.
- Requires the parcel to have been actively devoted to agricultural/horticultural uses for the two years preceding the tax year to qualify.
- Specifies that no law shall be passed requiring a parcel to be greater than 5 acres in area to be valued at less than fair market value under this article (language appears intended to limit a minimum parcel size threshold greater than 5 acres; readers should review exact phrasing and legislative history for interpretation).
- Procedural steps noted: reported favorably by committee and placed on file; multiple joint session dates and referrals listed. As a constitutional amendment, it requires the General Court to agree again in the next session and voter approval at a statewide election.
If you want, I can:
- Draft a one‑page explainer targeted to agency HR/finance staff describing operational implications of the South Carolina change; or
- Pull together a timeline of the remaining steps (floor votes, governor signature) for the South Carolina bill and the next steps required for the Massachusetts constitutional amendment.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
