WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 3290

Organized Retail and Supply Chain Crimes Advisory Board establishment and appropriation

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Matt Klein and 2 co-sponsors

Establish a state Organized Retail and Supply Chain Crimes Advisory Board to coordinate policy, training, and funding to combat organized retail crime and supply-chain vulnerabilit

Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety
#boards #crimesandcriminals #publicsafetyandpublicsafetydepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 3290

Summary of SF 3290 — Organized Retail and Supply Chain Crimes Advisory Board Establishment and Appropriation

Overview

  • Bill number and title: SF 3290, Organized Retail and Supply Chain Crimes Advisory Board establishment and appropriation
  • Jurisdiction/compass: Minnesota Legislature
  • Status: Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety
  • Introduced: April 7, 2025
  • Classification/Subjects: Appropriations, Boards, Crimes and Criminals, Public Safety and Public Safety Department
  • Companion bill: HF 2879

Note: The text of the bill is not provided here. This summary reflects the information available (title, status, and related actions) and outlines the likely scope and impact based on the bill’s purpose as stated in its title, along with common features of similar proposed measures.

Purpose and intent

  • Create a state-level Organized Retail and Supply Chain Crimes Advisory Board to address crimes related to organized retail activity and supply-chain vulnerabilities.
  • Provide an appropriation to support the board’s activities and related efforts. The bill aims to improve coordination, policy guidance, and resource allocation to combat organized retail crime and disruptions within the supply chain.

Key provisions (as implied by the title and standard structure of similar bills)

  • Establishment of a governing board: Form a formal advisory body to guide state efforts against organized retail and supply chain crimes.
  • Membership and governance (likely elements): The board would typically include representatives from law enforcement, prosecutors, retailers/supply chain businesses, state agencies (e.g., public safety, commerce, transportation), and perhaps other stakeholders. It may set meetings, voting rules, and governance procedures.
  • Duties and responsibilities (likely elements):
    • Develop policy recommendations to deter, investigate, and prosecute organized retail crime.
    • Coordinate multi-agency efforts and information sharing.
    • Identify best practices, training needs, and resource gaps.
    • Analyze data on organized retail crime and supply chain vulnerabilities.
    • Prepare periodic reports or recommendations for the legislature.
  • Appropriations and program funding: Provide state funds to support board operations, training, grants, data systems, or pilot projects related to organized retail and supply chain crime enforcement or prevention.
  • Reporting requirements: Potential requirements for annual or periodic reporting to the legislature on activities, outcomes, and fiscal needs.
  • Duration and sunset (possible): Some boards include sunset provisions or reviews; not specified here, but common in appropriation-driven boards.

Because the full text is not available, the above provisions reflect typical components in similar boards. The exact membership, duties, funding levels, and reporting timelines would be specified in the enacted bill.

Affected parties

  • Retailers and supply-chain businesses: potential beneficiaries of enhanced coordination, training, and enforcement focus.
  • Law enforcement and prosecutorial entities: involvement in advisory activities, data sharing, investigations, and policy development.
  • Minnesota Department of Public Safety and related agencies: potential administrator or partner in implementing board activities.
  • General public and workers: indirect beneficiaries through improved safety, reduced crime, and more resilient supply chains.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and first reading: April 7, 2025
  • Committee referrals: Judiciary and Public Safety (currently)
  • Companion bill: HF 2879 (indicates parallel consideration in another chamber or chamber of origin)
  • Next steps (unknown from available info): Committee hearings, potential amendments, floor votes, and eventual passage or rejection. If enacted, the bill would specify effective dates and any transition provisions.

Practical impact (potential)

  • Establishing the advisory board could centralize guidance on policy, training, and resource allocation to combat organized retail crime and supply chain vulnerabilities.
  • The accompanying appropriation would provide funding to support board activities, potentially enabling investigations, data systems, and coordination initiatives.
  • The exact scope, authority, and budget would determine the magnitude of impact on enforcement practices and retailer protections.

For the most precise understanding, refer to the bill’s full text and any fiscal notes or committee analysis once available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.