WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 5064

Office of Justice Programs appropriation to support trafficking victims

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Ron Latz

Minnesota SF 5064 would appropriate funds to the Office of Justice Programs to fund victim services for human trafficking survivors and coordinate support across agencies.

Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety
#appropriations #publicsafetyandpublicsafetydepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 5064

Summary of SF 5064 (2025-2026) – Minnesota: Office of Justice Programs appropriation to support trafficking victims

Basic details

  • Bill: SF 5064
  • Session: 2025-2026
  • Jurisdiction: Minnesota
  • Title/Purpose (as provided): An appropriation to the Office of Justice Programs to support trafficking victims
  • Introduced: 2026-04-09 (First reading)
  • Referred to: Judiciary and Public Safety
  • Sponsors: Chief author not listed; Co-sponsor: Senator Ron Latz

1) Main purpose and intent

SF 5064 seeks to appropriate funds through Minnesota’s Office of Justice Programs (OJP) specifically to support victims of human trafficking. The bill aims to ensure that the state has dedicated financial resources to services, protection, and assistance for trafficking victims, coordinated through the OJP’s programmatic framework. The core intent is to bolster state-level capacity to identify, assist, and empower trafficking survivors, with a focus on victim-centered supports within the criminal justice and social services systems.

2) Key provisions and changes (what the bill would do)

  • Appropriation to OJP: Establishes or specifies an operating or programmatic appropriation within the Office of Justice Programs to fund trafficking victim services.
  • Programmatic Focus (implied): Likely supports a range of victim services such as case management, counseling, legal advocacy, safe housing, medical and mental health care, and coordination with law enforcement and prosecutors. The exact line items, grant mechanisms, and eligible expenditures would be defined in the bill’s appropriations language and any accompanying fiscal notes.
  • Administration and Oversight: As an OJP appropriation, the bill would typically assign responsibilities to OJP for program administration, contract/grant management, reporting, and compliance with state procurement and safeguarding standards.
  • Coordination with Partnerships: Expect a framework for collaboration with state agencies (e.g., DHS, human services, public safety), local jurisdictions, service providers, and victim support organizations to deliver comprehensive services.

Note: The provided summary is based on the bill’s title and standard structure for an OJP trafficking victims appropriation. The actual text would specify exact programmatic line items, grant criteria, distribution formula, appropriations amount, reporting requirements, and any sunset or renewal provisions.

3) Who or what would be affected

  • Primary beneficiaries: Individuals identified as victims of human trafficking who require services and support to recover and navigate the criminal justice and social service systems.
  • State agencies: Office of Justice Programs would administer the allocation, oversight, and reporting; potentially other state agencies may participate via interagency agreements for service delivery.
  • Service providers and local governments: Grants or contracts to non-profit organizations, social service agencies, and local jurisdictions that provide direct victim services.
  • Public safety and legal systems: Enhanced coordination with law enforcement, prosecutors, and courts to ensure survivor-centered approaches, safe reporting, and access to necessary protections and remedies.

4) Procedural and timeline considerations

  • Introduction and referral: SF 5064 introduced and referred to Judiciary and Public Safety on 2026-04-09.
  • Process expectations: As an appropriations bill, it would typically undergo fiscal and policy analysis, hearings, and potential amendments in committee(s) before moving to floor votes in the Minnesota Senate. If passed, it would proceed to the Minnesota House (as applicable in the state’s bicameral process) and then to the governor for signature.
  • Implementation timeline (typical): If enacted in the 2025-2026 cycle, funding would normally take effect with the state’s next fiscal year starting July 1 of the following year, unless otherwise specified in the bill.

Notes for readers

  • The summary above reflects the bill’s stated purpose to fund trafficking victim supports via the Office of Justice Programs. For a precise understanding of the appropriation amount, eligible expenditures, grant terms, reporting requirements, and any sunset provisions, the full bill text and fiscal notes should be consulted once available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.